Bahamas vs Costa Rica: Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square

Bahamas
1.03 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Costa Rica
1.13 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Bahamas rank
52nd
Costa Rica rank
49th

Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square over time

  • Bahamas
  • Costa Rica
0250.0k500.0k750.0k1.0M1.2M196119922023

How they compare

Costa Rica currently reports 1.13 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 1.03 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Bahamas, a difference of 99,660 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Costa Rica's figure about 1.1 times Bahamas's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 35 shared years of data; in 1989 it was Bahamas ahead.

Bahamas ranks 52nd and Costa Rica ranks 49th of 169 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Bahamas averaged higher in 4 and Costa Rica in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bahamas Costa Rica Difference Ahead
1980s 631,255 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 324,183 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 307,072 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Bahamas
1990s 672,015 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 407,395 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 264,621 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Bahamas
2000s 958,200 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 575,950 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 382,249 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Bahamas
2010s 901,879 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 887,061 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 14,818 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Bahamas
2020s 932,126 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 1.06 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 131,986 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Costa Rica

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 us$), per square, Bahamas or Costa Rica?
Costa Rica, at 1.13 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 1.03 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Bahamas as of 2023.
What is the difference in final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 us$), per square between Bahamas and Costa Rica?
99,660 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Costa Rica ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bahamas and Costa Rica?
35 years are reported by both, from 1989 to 2023.
How do Bahamas and Costa Rica rank globally for final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 us$), per square?
Bahamas ranks 52nd and Costa Rica ranks 49th of 169 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bahamas vs Costa Rica: Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/final-consumption-expenditure-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/bahamas-the/costa-rica/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/final-consumption-expenditure-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/bahamas-the/costa-rica/">Bahamas vs Costa Rica: Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
211 places, 8,516 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.