Algeria vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square

Algeria
54,826 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Tanzania, United Republic of
51,670 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Algeria rank
143rd
Tanzania, United Republic of rank
146th

Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square over time

  • Algeria
  • Tanzania, United Republic of
020.0k40.0k60.0k196119922023

How they compare

Algeria currently reports 54,826 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 51,670 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Tanzania, United Republic of, a difference of 3,156 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Algeria's figure about 1.1 times Tanzania, United Republic of's.

Across all 34 years both countries report, Algeria has been ahead every year.

Algeria ranks 143rd and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 146th of 169 countries.

Algeria has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Algeria Tanzania, United Republic of Difference Ahead
1990s 21,071 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 14,222 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 6,849 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Algeria
2000s 27,873 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 22,994 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 4,879 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Algeria
2010s 45,464 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 38,079 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 7,385 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Algeria
2020s 52,263 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 48,791 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 3,473 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Algeria

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 us$), per square, Algeria or Tanzania, United Republic of?
Algeria, at 54,826 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 51,670 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Tanzania, United Republic of as of 2023.
What is the difference in final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 us$), per square between Algeria and Tanzania, United Republic of?
3,156 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Algeria ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Algeria and Tanzania, United Republic of?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Algeria and Tanzania, United Republic of rank globally for final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 us$), per square?
Algeria ranks 143rd and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 146th of 169 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Algeria vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/final-consumption-expenditure-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/algeria/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/final-consumption-expenditure-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/algeria/tanzania/">Algeria vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
211 places, 8,516 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.