Eritrea vs Greenland: External balance on goods and services
Eritrea
-3.52 billion current LCU
in 2011
Greenland
-2.36 billion current LCU
in 2023
Eritrea rank
100th
Greenland rank
98th
External balance on goods and services over time
- Eritrea
- Greenland
How they compare
Greenland currently reports -2.36 billion current LCU against -3.52 billion current LCU in Eritrea, a difference of 1.16 billion current LCU.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 9 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Greenland ahead.
Eritrea ranks 100th and Greenland ranks 98th of 192 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Eritrea averaged higher in 1 and Greenland in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eritrea | Greenland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | -6.34 billion current LCU | -2.31 billion current LCU | 4.03 billion current LCU | Greenland |
| 2010s | -4.78 billion current LCU | -6.91 billion current LCU | 2.13 billion current LCU | Eritrea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher external balance on goods and services, Eritrea or Greenland?
- Greenland, at -2.36 billion current LCU against -3.52 billion current LCU in Eritrea as of 2023.
- What is the difference in external balance on goods and services between Eritrea and Greenland?
- 1.16 billion current LCU, with Greenland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and Greenland?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2011.
- How do Eritrea and Greenland rank globally for external balance on goods and services?
- Eritrea ranks 100th and Greenland ranks 98th of 192 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as External balance on goods and services (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The balance of international trade in goods and services is the difference between the exports and imports of goods and services. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This series is expressed in local currency units.