Latvia vs Mauritius: Exports of goods and services
Exports of goods and services over time
- Latvia
- Mauritius
How they compare
Mauritius currently reports 65.0% against 62.6% in Latvia, a difference of 2.4%.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Mauritius ahead.
Latvia ranks 39th and Mauritius ranks 37th of 193 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Latvia averaged higher in 2 and Mauritius in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Mauritius | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 38.9% | 61.8% | 22.9% | Mauritius |
| 2000s | 40.4% | 56.3% | 15.9% | Mauritius |
| 2010s | 62.1% | 58.8% | 3.3% | Latvia |
| 2020s | 66.7% | 64.1% | 2.7% | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher exports of goods and services, Latvia or Mauritius?
- Mauritius, at 65.0% against 62.6% in Latvia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in exports of goods and services between Latvia and Mauritius?
- 2.4%, with Mauritius ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Mauritius?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2025.
- How do Latvia and Mauritius rank globally for exports of goods and services?
- Latvia ranks 39th and Mauritius ranks 37th of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Offices (NSOs), published as Exports of goods and services (% of GDP). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Exports of goods includes changes in the economic ownership of goods from residents of the compiling economy to non-residents, irrespective of physical movement of goods across national borders. Exports of services includes services provided by residents to non-residents. This indicator is expressed as a percentage of Gross Domestic Product (GDP) which is the total income earned through the production of goods and services in an economic territory during an accounting period.