Congo vs Equatorial Guinea: Edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c.

Congo
91.49
in 2025
Equatorial Guinea
80.38
in 2025
Congo rank
51st
Equatorial Guinea rank
53rd

Edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. over time

  • Congo
  • Equatorial Guinea
255075100125199120082025

How they compare

Congo currently reports 91.49 against 80.38 in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 11.11.

That makes Congo's figure about 1.1 times Equatorial Guinea's.

The two have swapped places 10 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Congo ahead.

Congo ranks 51st and Equatorial Guinea ranks 53rd of 54 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 3 and Equatorial Guinea in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo Equatorial Guinea Difference Ahead
1990s 45.99 27.27 18.72 Congo
2000s 80.51 64.43 16.08 Congo
2010s 98.56 102.88 4.32 Equatorial Guinea
2020s 86.14 81.71 4.43 Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c., Congo or Equatorial Guinea?
Congo, at 91.49 against 80.38 in Equatorial Guinea as of 2025.
What is the difference in edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. between Congo and Equatorial Guinea?
11.11, with Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Equatorial Guinea?
35 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2025.
How do Congo and Equatorial Guinea rank globally for edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c.?
Congo ranks 51st and Equatorial Guinea ranks 53rd of 54 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c., fresh — Producer Price Index (2014-2016 = 100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs Equatorial Guinea: Edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c.. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/edible-roots-and-tubers-with-high-starch-or-inulin-content-n-e-c-fresh-producer-price/congo-rep/equatorial-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/edible-roots-and-tubers-with-high-starch-or-inulin-content-n-e-c-fresh-producer-price/congo-rep/equatorial-guinea/">Congo vs Equatorial Guinea: Edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c.</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c., fresh — Producer Price Index (2014-2016 = 100)
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
57 places, 1,878 data points, 1991–2025
Last refreshed

This sub-domain contains data on agriculture producer prices and the producer price index. Agriculture producer prices are prices received by farmers for primary crops, live animals and livestock primary products as collected at the point of initial sale (prices paid at the farm gate). Annual data are provided from 1991 (while mothly data start in January 2010) for 180 countries and 212 products. The producer price index is the index of agricultural producer prices that measures the average annual change over time in the selling prices received by farmers (prices at the farm gate or at the first point of sale). The three categories of producer price index available in FAOSTAT comprise: single-item price index, commodity group index and the agriculture producer price index.