China, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region vs Mozambique: Domestic material consumption per unit of GDP, by type of raw

China, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region
0.3579 kg per constant US$
in 2022
Mozambique
4.99 kg per constant US$
in 2022
China, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region rank
31st
Mozambique rank
29th

Domestic material consumption per unit of GDP, by type of raw over time

  • China, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region
  • Mozambique
-10-50510200020122024

How they compare

Mozambique currently reports 4.99 kg per constant US$ against 0.3579 kg per constant US$ in China, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, a difference of 4.63 kg per constant US$.

That makes Mozambique's figure about 13.9 times China, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Mozambique ahead.

China, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region ranks 31st and Mozambique ranks 29th of 36 groups.

Mozambique has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade China, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region Mozambique Difference Ahead
2000s 0.3155 kg per constant US$ 7.96 kg per constant US$ 7.65 kg per constant US$ Mozambique
2010s 0.2704 kg per constant US$ 3.35 kg per constant US$ 3.08 kg per constant US$ Mozambique
2020s 0.3531 kg per constant US$ 4.91 kg per constant US$ 4.55 kg per constant US$ Mozambique

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher domestic material consumption per unit of gdp, by type of raw material, China, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region or Mozambique?
Mozambique, at 4.99 kg per constant US$ against 0.3579 kg per constant US$ in China, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region as of 2022.
What is the difference in domestic material consumption per unit of gdp, by type of raw material between China, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region and Mozambique?
4.63 kg per constant US$, with Mozambique ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region and Mozambique?
25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
How do China, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region and Mozambique rank globally for domestic material consumption per unit of gdp, by type of raw material?
China, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region ranks 31st and Mozambique ranks 29th of 36 groups.
Where does this data come from?
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Domestic material consumption per unit of GDP, by type of raw material (kilograms per constant 2020 United States dollars). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region vs Mozambique: Domestic material consumption per unit of GDP, by type of raw material. Statizoid, drawing on United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database. Retrieved 07 November 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/domestic-material-consumption-per-unit-of-gdp-by-type-of-raw-material-kilograms-per/china-hong-kong-special-administrative-region/mozambique/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/domestic-material-consumption-per-unit-of-gdp-by-type-of-raw-material-kilograms-per/china-hong-kong-special-administrative-region/mozambique/">China, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region vs Mozambique: Domestic material consumption per unit of GDP, by type of raw material</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Domestic material consumption per unit of GDP, by type of raw material (kilograms per constant 2020 United States dollars)
Unit
kg per constant US$
Source
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database
Licence
UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested)
Coverage
262 places, 5,949 data points, 2000–2022
Last refreshed