Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Jordan: Domestic material consumption per unit of GDP, by type of raw material
Bosnia and Herzegovina
1.56
in 2022
Jordan
1.51
in 2022
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
107th
Jordan rank
109th
Domestic material consumption per unit of GDP, by type of raw material over time
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Jordan
How they compare
Bosnia and Herzegovina currently reports 1.56 against 1.51 in Jordan, a difference of 0.05.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 9 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 107th and Jordan ranks 109th of 224 countries.
Bosnia and Herzegovina has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bosnia and Herzegovina | Jordan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 1.86 | 1.56 | 0.2926 | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
| 2020s | 1.62 | 1.49 | 0.1283 | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher domestic material consumption per unit of gdp, by type of raw material, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Jordan?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina, at 1.56 against 1.51 in Jordan as of 2022.
- What is the difference in domestic material consumption per unit of gdp, by type of raw material between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Jordan?
- 0.05, with Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Jordan?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2023.
- How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Jordan rank globally for domestic material consumption per unit of gdp, by type of raw material?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 107th and Jordan ranks 109th of 224 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Domestic material consumption per unit of GDP, by type of raw material (kilograms per constant 2020 United States dollars). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.