Ghana vs Uruguay: Completion rate, upper secondary education, urban — Value — All age
Completion rate, upper secondary education, urban — Value — All age over time
- Ghana
- Uruguay
How they compare
Ghana currently reports 61.05 % against 55.01 % in Uruguay, a difference of 6.04 %.
That makes Ghana's figure about 1.1 times Uruguay's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Uruguay ahead.
Ghana ranks 53rd and Uruguay ranks 55th of 80 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Ghana averaged higher in 1 and Uruguay in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ghana | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 24.81 % | 32.75 % | 7.94 % | Uruguay |
| 2010s | 33.03 % | 36.45 % | 3.42 % | Uruguay |
| 2020s | 61.05 % | 49.4 % | 11.65 % | Ghana |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher completion rate, upper secondary education, urban — value — all age, Ghana or Uruguay?
- Ghana, at 61.05 % against 55.01 % in Uruguay as of 2022.
- What is the difference in completion rate, upper secondary education, urban — value — all age between Ghana and Uruguay?
- 6.04 %, with Ghana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ghana and Uruguay?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2022.
- How do Ghana and Uruguay rank globally for completion rate, upper secondary education, urban — value — all age?
- Ghana ranks 53rd and Uruguay ranks 55th of 80 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Completion rate, upper secondary education, urban — Value — All age ranges or no breakdown by age — Urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Suite of Gender Indicators presents a set of indicators relevant to agrifood systems that are disaggregated by sex, with the aim of highlighting gender differences across agrifood systems. The initial set of indicators is based on those used in FAO’s 2023 Status of Women in Agrifood Systems (SWAFS) report and on the recommendations of an expert consultation held in December 2023, and covers key dimensions including economic participation, governance, agency, social norms, assets and services, education, health, and nutrition. Indicator selection was informed by expert judgment and by the availability of data with sufficient geographic and temporal coverage to enable meaningful comparisons across regions and over time. While most indicators are produced and published by FAO and other international organizations, the objective of this domain is to provide a one-stop shop for sex-disaggregated data on agrifood systems.