Paraguay vs Uruguay: Completion rate, upper secondary education, rural — Value — Male
Completion rate, upper secondary education, rural — Value — Male over time
- Paraguay
- Uruguay
How they compare
Uruguay currently reports 53.25 % against 52.1 % in Paraguay, a difference of 1.15 %.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Paraguay ahead.
Paraguay ranks 44th and Uruguay ranks 42nd of 73 countries.
Paraguay has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Paraguay | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 28.25 % | 15.6 % | 12.65 % | Paraguay |
| 2010s | 40.21 % | 24.1 % | 16.11 % | Paraguay |
| 2020s | 51.8 % | 48.34 % | 3.46 % | Paraguay |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher completion rate, upper secondary education, rural — value — male, Paraguay or Uruguay?
- Uruguay, at 53.25 % against 52.1 % in Paraguay as of 2024.
- What is the difference in completion rate, upper secondary education, rural — value — male between Paraguay and Uruguay?
- 1.15 %, with Uruguay ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Paraguay and Uruguay?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2024.
- How do Paraguay and Uruguay rank globally for completion rate, upper secondary education, rural — value — male?
- Paraguay ranks 44th and Uruguay ranks 42nd of 73 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Completion rate, upper secondary education, rural — Value — Male — All age ranges or no breakdown by age — Rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Suite of Gender Indicators presents a set of indicators relevant to agrifood systems that are disaggregated by sex, with the aim of highlighting gender differences across agrifood systems. The initial set of indicators is based on those used in FAO’s 2023 Status of Women in Agrifood Systems (SWAFS) report and on the recommendations of an expert consultation held in December 2023, and covers key dimensions including economic participation, governance, agency, social norms, assets and services, education, health, and nutrition. Indicator selection was informed by expert judgment and by the availability of data with sufficient geographic and temporal coverage to enable meaningful comparisons across regions and over time. While most indicators are produced and published by FAO and other international organizations, the objective of this domain is to provide a one-stop shop for sex-disaggregated data on agrifood systems.