Brazil vs India: Completion rate, upper secondary education, rural — Value — Male
Completion rate, upper secondary education, rural — Value — Male over time
- Brazil
- India
How they compare
India currently reports 49.49 % against 48.1 % in Brazil, a difference of 1.39 %.
Across all 5 years both countries report, India has been ahead every year.
Brazil ranks 47th and India ranks 46th of 73 countries.
India has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | India | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 16.6 % | 20.77 % | 4.17 % | India |
| 2010s | 36.4 % | 40.04 % | 3.64 % | India |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher completion rate, upper secondary education, rural — value — male, Brazil or India?
- India, at 49.49 % against 48.1 % in Brazil as of 2019.
- What is the difference in completion rate, upper secondary education, rural — value — male between Brazil and India?
- 1.39 %, with India ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and India?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Brazil and India rank globally for completion rate, upper secondary education, rural — value — male?
- Brazil ranks 47th and India ranks 46th of 73 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Completion rate, upper secondary education, rural — Value — Male — All age ranges or no breakdown by age — Rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Suite of Gender Indicators presents a set of indicators relevant to agrifood systems that are disaggregated by sex, with the aim of highlighting gender differences across agrifood systems. The initial set of indicators is based on those used in FAO’s 2023 Status of Women in Agrifood Systems (SWAFS) report and on the recommendations of an expert consultation held in December 2023, and covers key dimensions including economic participation, governance, agency, social norms, assets and services, education, health, and nutrition. Indicator selection was informed by expert judgment and by the availability of data with sufficient geographic and temporal coverage to enable meaningful comparisons across regions and over time. While most indicators are produced and published by FAO and other international organizations, the objective of this domain is to provide a one-stop shop for sex-disaggregated data on agrifood systems.