El Salvador vs Nepal: Completion rate, lower secondary education, urban — Value — All age
Completion rate, lower secondary education, urban — Value — All age over time
- El Salvador
- Nepal
How they compare
El Salvador currently reports 83.8 % against 80.69 % in Nepal, a difference of 3.11 %.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2001 it was El Salvador ahead.
El Salvador ranks 52nd and Nepal ranks 54th of 77 countries.
El Salvador has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | El Salvador | Nepal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 70.76 % | 62.42 % | 8.34 % | El Salvador |
| 2010s | 82.4 % | 78.24 % | 4.16 % | El Salvador |
| 2020s | 83.1 % | 80.69 % | 2.41 % | El Salvador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher completion rate, lower secondary education, urban — value — all age, El Salvador or Nepal?
- El Salvador, at 83.8 % against 80.69 % in Nepal as of 2023.
- What is the difference in completion rate, lower secondary education, urban — value — all age between El Salvador and Nepal?
- 3.11 %, with El Salvador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Nepal?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2021.
- How do El Salvador and Nepal rank globally for completion rate, lower secondary education, urban — value — all age?
- El Salvador ranks 52nd and Nepal ranks 54th of 77 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Completion rate, lower secondary education, urban — Value — All age ranges or no breakdown by age — Urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Suite of Gender Indicators presents a set of indicators relevant to agrifood systems that are disaggregated by sex, with the aim of highlighting gender differences across agrifood systems. The initial set of indicators is based on those used in FAO’s 2023 Status of Women in Agrifood Systems (SWAFS) report and on the recommendations of an expert consultation held in December 2023, and covers key dimensions including economic participation, governance, agency, social norms, assets and services, education, health, and nutrition. Indicator selection was informed by expert judgment and by the availability of data with sufficient geographic and temporal coverage to enable meaningful comparisons across regions and over time. While most indicators are produced and published by FAO and other international organizations, the objective of this domain is to provide a one-stop shop for sex-disaggregated data on agrifood systems.