Argentina vs Guyana: Completion rate, lower secondary education, urban — Value — All age
Completion rate, lower secondary education, urban — Value — All age over time
- Argentina
- Guyana
How they compare
Guyana currently reports 91.01 % against 89.4 % in Argentina, a difference of 1.61 %.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Guyana has been ahead every year.
Argentina ranks 44th and Guyana ranks 41st of 77 countries.
Guyana has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Argentina | Guyana | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 75.5 % | 88.42 % | 12.92 % | Guyana |
| 2010s | 78.95 % | 90.75 % | 11.8 % | Guyana |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher completion rate, lower secondary education, urban — value — all age, Argentina or Guyana?
- Guyana, at 91.01 % against 89.4 % in Argentina as of 2019.
- What is the difference in completion rate, lower secondary education, urban — value — all age between Argentina and Guyana?
- 1.61 %, with Guyana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Guyana?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2019.
- How do Argentina and Guyana rank globally for completion rate, lower secondary education, urban — value — all age?
- Argentina ranks 44th and Guyana ranks 41st of 77 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Completion rate, lower secondary education, urban — Value — All age ranges or no breakdown by age — Urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Suite of Gender Indicators presents a set of indicators relevant to agrifood systems that are disaggregated by sex, with the aim of highlighting gender differences across agrifood systems. The initial set of indicators is based on those used in FAO’s 2023 Status of Women in Agrifood Systems (SWAFS) report and on the recommendations of an expert consultation held in December 2023, and covers key dimensions including economic participation, governance, agency, social norms, assets and services, education, health, and nutrition. Indicator selection was informed by expert judgment and by the availability of data with sufficient geographic and temporal coverage to enable meaningful comparisons across regions and over time. While most indicators are produced and published by FAO and other international organizations, the objective of this domain is to provide a one-stop shop for sex-disaggregated data on agrifood systems.