Paraguay vs Philippines: Completion rate, lower secondary education, rural — Value — Male
Completion rate, lower secondary education, rural — Value — Male over time
- Paraguay
- Philippines
How they compare
Paraguay currently reports 77.65 % against 74.75 % in Philippines, a difference of 2.9 %.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Philippines ahead.
Paraguay ranks 45th and Philippines ranks 47th of 72 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Paraguay averaged higher in 2 and Philippines in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Paraguay | Philippines | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 43.85 % | 47.49 % | 3.64 % | Philippines |
| 2010s | 64.15 % | 63.57 % | 0.58 % | Paraguay |
| 2020s | 79.7 % | 74.75 % | 4.95 % | Paraguay |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher completion rate, lower secondary education, rural — value — male, Paraguay or Philippines?
- Paraguay, at 77.65 % against 74.75 % in Philippines as of 2024.
- What is the difference in completion rate, lower secondary education, rural — value — male between Paraguay and Philippines?
- 2.9 %, with Paraguay ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Paraguay and Philippines?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2022.
- How do Paraguay and Philippines rank globally for completion rate, lower secondary education, rural — value — male?
- Paraguay ranks 45th and Philippines ranks 47th of 72 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Completion rate, lower secondary education, rural — Value — Male — All age ranges or no breakdown by age — Rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Suite of Gender Indicators presents a set of indicators relevant to agrifood systems that are disaggregated by sex, with the aim of highlighting gender differences across agrifood systems. The initial set of indicators is based on those used in FAO’s 2023 Status of Women in Agrifood Systems (SWAFS) report and on the recommendations of an expert consultation held in December 2023, and covers key dimensions including economic participation, governance, agency, social norms, assets and services, education, health, and nutrition. Indicator selection was informed by expert judgment and by the availability of data with sufficient geographic and temporal coverage to enable meaningful comparisons across regions and over time. While most indicators are produced and published by FAO and other international organizations, the objective of this domain is to provide a one-stop shop for sex-disaggregated data on agrifood systems.