Lower middle income vs Poland: Charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts (BoP, current)

Lower middle income
92.62 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Poland
4,473 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Lower middle income rank
31st
Poland rank
32nd

Charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts (BoP, current) over time

  • Lower middle income
  • Poland
01.0k2.0k3.0k4.0k5.0k197419982023

How they compare

Poland currently reports 4,473 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 92.62 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Lower middle income, a difference of 4,380 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Poland's figure about 48.3 times Lower middle income's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 30 shared years of data; in 1994 it was Lower middle income ahead.

Lower middle income ranks 31st and Poland ranks 32nd of 47 groups.

Poland has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Lower middle income Poland Difference Ahead
1990s 5.86 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 56.05 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 50.19 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Poland
2000s 22.31 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 224.62 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 202.31 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Poland
2010s 38.09 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 1,333 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 1,295 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Poland
2020s 75.61 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 4,221 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 4,145 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Poland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts (bop, current), Lower middle income or Poland?
Poland, at 4,473 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 92.62 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Lower middle income as of 2023.
What is the difference in charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts (bop, current) between Lower middle income and Poland?
4,380 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre, with Poland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Lower middle income and Poland?
30 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2023.
How do Lower middle income and Poland rank globally for charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts (bop, current)?
Lower middle income ranks 31st and Poland ranks 32nd of 47 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Lower middle income vs Poland: Charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts (BoP, current). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/charges-for-the-use-of-intellectual-property-receipts-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/lower-middle-income/poland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/charges-for-the-use-of-intellectual-property-receipts-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/lower-middle-income/poland/">Lower middle income vs Poland: Charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts (BoP, current)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
198 places, 6,099 data points, 1962–2023
Last refreshed

Charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts (BoP, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.