Kazakhstan vs Mauritius: Asset-backed pensions - main database — Investment

Kazakhstan
27.65 Percentage change
in 2024
Mauritius
32.54 Percentage change
in 2023
Kazakhstan rank
8th
Mauritius rank
6th

Asset-backed pensions - main database — Investment over time

  • Kazakhstan
  • Mauritius
0200400600800200220132024

How they compare

Mauritius currently reports 32.54 Percentage change against 27.65 Percentage change in Kazakhstan, a difference of 4.89 Percentage change.

That makes Mauritius's figure about 1.2 times Kazakhstan's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Kazakhstan ahead.

Kazakhstan ranks 8th and Mauritius ranks 6th of 75 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Kazakhstan averaged higher in 2 and Mauritius in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kazakhstan Mauritius Difference Ahead
2000s 38.59 Percentage change 15.51 Percentage change 23.08 Percentage change Kazakhstan
2010s 13.13 Percentage change 758.6 Percentage change 745.47 Percentage change Mauritius
2020s 13.63 Percentage change 10.24 Percentage change 3.39 Percentage change Kazakhstan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher asset-backed pensions - main database — investment, Kazakhstan or Mauritius?
Mauritius, at 32.54 Percentage change against 27.65 Percentage change in Kazakhstan as of 2023.
What is the difference in asset-backed pensions - main database — investment between Kazakhstan and Mauritius?
4.89 Percentage change, with Mauritius ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Mauritius?
9 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2023.
How do Kazakhstan and Mauritius rank globally for asset-backed pensions - main database — investment?
Kazakhstan ranks 8th and Mauritius ranks 6th of 75 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Asset-backed pensions - main database — Investment. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Kazakhstan vs Mauritius: Asset-backed pensions - main database — Investment. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 23 August 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/asset-backed-pensions-main-database-investment/kazakhstan/mauritius/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/asset-backed-pensions-main-database-investment/kazakhstan/mauritius/">Kazakhstan vs Mauritius: Asset-backed pensions - main database — Investment</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Asset-backed pensions - main database — Investment
Unit
Percentage change
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
85 places, 1,483 data points, 1982–2024
Last refreshed

This database on asset-backed pensions is based on data collected through the OECD Global Pension Statistics exercise. Data come from various administrative sources, mainly: pension supervisory authorities, financial market authorities, ministries of finance, or national statistical offices. Data cover all asset-backed pension arrangements where assets are accumulated to back future benefit payments, except reserves of public (pay-as-you-go) pension arrangements. Asset-backed pension plans may be financed through different vehicles (such as pension funds, pension insurance contracts, bank or investment company managed funds), publicly or privately administered, mandatory or voluntary, occupational or personal, defined benefit (DB) or defined contribution (DC), for public or private-sector workers. Employers’ book reserves are also in the scope. This database includes various statistics and indicators on asset-backed pensions such as the amount of assets earmarked for retirement, the liabilities of pension providers, their revenues, their expenditure, the number of funds and plans, as well as plan membership. These statistics and indicators can be split by type of financing vehicle and type of plan.