Hong Kong, China vs Uruguay: Asset-backed pensions - main database — Investment

Hong Kong, China
10.39 Percentage change
in 2024
Uruguay
10.54 Percentage change
in 2024
Hong Kong, China rank
40th
Uruguay rank
39th

Asset-backed pensions - main database — Investment over time

  • Hong Kong, China
  • Uruguay
02040200220132024

How they compare

Uruguay currently reports 10.54 Percentage change against 10.39 Percentage change in Hong Kong, China, a difference of 0.15 Percentage change.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 22 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Uruguay ahead.

Hong Kong, China ranks 40th and Uruguay ranks 39th of 75 countries.

Uruguay has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Hong Kong, China Uruguay Difference Ahead
2000s 14.09 Percentage change 23.53 Percentage change 9.43 Percentage change Uruguay
2010s 9.68 Percentage change 19.19 Percentage change 9.52 Percentage change Uruguay
2020s 5.62 Percentage change 11.67 Percentage change 6.05 Percentage change Uruguay

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher asset-backed pensions - main database — investment, Hong Kong, China or Uruguay?
Uruguay, at 10.54 Percentage change against 10.39 Percentage change in Hong Kong, China as of 2024.
What is the difference in asset-backed pensions - main database — investment between Hong Kong, China and Uruguay?
0.15 Percentage change, with Uruguay ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong, China and Uruguay?
22 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2024.
How do Hong Kong, China and Uruguay rank globally for asset-backed pensions - main database — investment?
Hong Kong, China ranks 40th and Uruguay ranks 39th of 75 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Asset-backed pensions - main database — Investment. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Hong Kong, China vs Uruguay: Asset-backed pensions - main database — Investment. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/asset-backed-pensions-main-database-investment/hong-kong-sar-china/uruguay/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/asset-backed-pensions-main-database-investment/hong-kong-sar-china/uruguay/">Hong Kong, China vs Uruguay: Asset-backed pensions - main database — Investment</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Asset-backed pensions - main database — Investment
Unit
Percentage change
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
85 places, 1,483 data points, 1982–2024
Last refreshed

This database on asset-backed pensions is based on data collected through the OECD Global Pension Statistics exercise. Data come from various administrative sources, mainly: pension supervisory authorities, financial market authorities, ministries of finance, or national statistical offices. Data cover all asset-backed pension arrangements where assets are accumulated to back future benefit payments, except reserves of public (pay-as-you-go) pension arrangements. Asset-backed pension plans may be financed through different vehicles (such as pension funds, pension insurance contracts, bank or investment company managed funds), publicly or privately administered, mandatory or voluntary, occupational or personal, defined benefit (DB) or defined contribution (DC), for public or private-sector workers. Employers’ book reserves are also in the scope. This database includes various statistics and indicators on asset-backed pensions such as the amount of assets earmarked for retirement, the liabilities of pension providers, their revenues, their expenditure, the number of funds and plans, as well as plan membership. These statistics and indicators can be split by type of financing vehicle and type of plan.