Croatia vs Kazakhstan: Asset-backed pensions - main database — Investment

Croatia
15.12 Percentage change
in 2024
Kazakhstan
27.65 Percentage change
in 2024
Croatia rank
2nd
Kazakhstan rank
8th

Asset-backed pensions - main database — Investment over time

  • Croatia
  • Kazakhstan
0255075100125200220132024

How they compare

Kazakhstan currently reports 27.65 Percentage change against 15.12 Percentage change in Croatia, a difference of 12.53 Percentage change.

That makes Kazakhstan's figure about 1.8 times Croatia's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Croatia ahead.

Croatia ranks 2nd and Kazakhstan ranks 8th of 3 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Croatia averaged higher in 2 and Kazakhstan in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Croatia Kazakhstan Difference Ahead
2000s 75.14 Percentage change 34.13 Percentage change 41.01 Percentage change Croatia
2010s 14.45 Percentage change 13.13 Percentage change 1.33 Percentage change Croatia
2020s 9.61 Percentage change 16.43 Percentage change 6.82 Percentage change Kazakhstan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher asset-backed pensions - main database — investment, Croatia or Kazakhstan?
Kazakhstan, at 27.65 Percentage change against 15.12 Percentage change in Croatia as of 2024.
What is the difference in asset-backed pensions - main database — investment between Croatia and Kazakhstan?
12.53 Percentage change, with Kazakhstan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Kazakhstan?
9 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2024.
How do Croatia and Kazakhstan rank globally for asset-backed pensions - main database — investment?
Croatia ranks 2nd and Kazakhstan ranks 8th of 3 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Asset-backed pensions - main database — Investment. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Croatia vs Kazakhstan: Asset-backed pensions - main database — Investment. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 29 August 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/asset-backed-pensions-main-database-investment/croatia-2/kazakhstan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/asset-backed-pensions-main-database-investment/croatia-2/kazakhstan/">Croatia vs Kazakhstan: Asset-backed pensions - main database — Investment</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Asset-backed pensions - main database — Investment
Unit
Percentage change
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
85 places, 1,483 data points, 1982–2024
Last refreshed

This database on asset-backed pensions is based on data collected through the OECD Global Pension Statistics exercise. Data come from various administrative sources, mainly: pension supervisory authorities, financial market authorities, ministries of finance, or national statistical offices. Data cover all asset-backed pension arrangements where assets are accumulated to back future benefit payments, except reserves of public (pay-as-you-go) pension arrangements. Asset-backed pension plans may be financed through different vehicles (such as pension funds, pension insurance contracts, bank or investment company managed funds), publicly or privately administered, mandatory or voluntary, occupational or personal, defined benefit (DB) or defined contribution (DC), for public or private-sector workers. Employers’ book reserves are also in the scope. This database includes various statistics and indicators on asset-backed pensions such as the amount of assets earmarked for retirement, the liabilities of pension providers, their revenues, their expenditure, the number of funds and plans, as well as plan membership. These statistics and indicators can be split by type of financing vehicle and type of plan.