Tajikistan vs Zimbabwe: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added

Tajikistan
2.60 billion constant 2015 US$
in 2024
Zimbabwe
2.79 billion constant 2015 US$
in 2025
Tajikistan rank
101st
Zimbabwe rank
98th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added over time

  • Tajikistan
  • Zimbabwe
01.0B2.0B3.0B4.0B196919972025

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 2.79 billion constant 2015 US$ against 2.60 billion constant 2015 US$ in Tajikistan, a difference of 190.27 million constant 2015 US$.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.1 times Tajikistan's.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 40 shared years of data; in 1985 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Tajikistan ranks 101st and Zimbabwe ranks 98th of 194 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Tajikistan averaged higher in 2 and Zimbabwe in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Tajikistan Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1980s 1.24 billion constant 2015 US$ 2.04 billion constant 2015 US$ 802.00 million constant 2015 US$ Zimbabwe
1990s 666.69 million constant 2015 US$ 2.50 billion constant 2015 US$ 1.83 billion constant 2015 US$ Zimbabwe
2000s 881.46 million constant 2015 US$ 2.19 billion constant 2015 US$ 1.30 billion constant 2015 US$ Zimbabwe
2010s 1.77 billion constant 2015 US$ 1.65 billion constant 2015 US$ 117.80 million constant 2015 US$ Tajikistan
2020s 2.51 billion constant 2015 US$ 2.38 billion constant 2015 US$ 128.80 million constant 2015 US$ Tajikistan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added, Tajikistan or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 2.79 billion constant 2015 US$ against 2.60 billion constant 2015 US$ in Tajikistan as of 2025.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added between Tajikistan and Zimbabwe?
190.27 million constant 2015 US$, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Tajikistan and Zimbabwe?
40 years are reported by both, from 1985 to 2024.
How do Tajikistan and Zimbabwe rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added?
Tajikistan ranks 101st and Zimbabwe ranks 98th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Tajikistan vs Zimbabwe: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added. Statizoid, drawing on Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks. Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us/tajikistan/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us/tajikistan/zimbabwe/">Tajikistan vs Zimbabwe: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)
Unit
constant 2015 US$
Source
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
240 places, 10,644 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing corresponds to ISIC (Rev. 4) divisions 01-03 and includes the exploitation of vegetal and animal natural resources, comprising the activities of growing of crops, raising and breeding of animals, harvesting of timber and other plants, animals or animal products from a farm or their natural habitats.Value added is the contribution to the economy by a producer or an industry or an institutional sector, which is estimated by the total value of output produced and deducting the total value of intermediate consumption of goods and services used to produce that output. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment is 2015. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.