Philippines vs Uzbekistan: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added

Philippines
36.58 billion constant 2015 US$
in 2025
Uzbekistan
34.87 billion constant 2015 US$
in 2025
Philippines rank
18th
Uzbekistan rank
20th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added over time

  • Philippines
  • Uzbekistan
10.0B20.0B30.0B40.0B196019922025

How they compare

Philippines currently reports 36.58 billion constant 2015 US$ against 34.87 billion constant 2015 US$ in Uzbekistan, a difference of 1.71 billion constant 2015 US$.

Across all 39 years both countries report, Philippines has been ahead every year.

Philippines ranks 18th and Uzbekistan ranks 20th of 194 countries.

Philippines has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Philippines Uzbekistan Difference Ahead
1980s 17.11 billion constant 2015 US$ 8.90 billion constant 2015 US$ 8.20 billion constant 2015 US$ Philippines
1990s 18.84 billion constant 2015 US$ 9.24 billion constant 2015 US$ 9.60 billion constant 2015 US$ Philippines
2000s 25.60 billion constant 2015 US$ 13.60 billion constant 2015 US$ 12.00 billion constant 2015 US$ Philippines
2010s 33.17 billion constant 2015 US$ 23.92 billion constant 2015 US$ 9.26 billion constant 2015 US$ Philippines
2020s 35.78 billion constant 2015 US$ 31.74 billion constant 2015 US$ 4.04 billion constant 2015 US$ Philippines

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added, Philippines or Uzbekistan?
Philippines, at 36.58 billion constant 2015 US$ against 34.87 billion constant 2015 US$ in Uzbekistan as of 2025.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added between Philippines and Uzbekistan?
1.71 billion constant 2015 US$, with Philippines ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Philippines and Uzbekistan?
39 years are reported by both, from 1987 to 2025.
How do Philippines and Uzbekistan rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added?
Philippines ranks 18th and Uzbekistan ranks 20th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Philippines vs Uzbekistan: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added. Statizoid, drawing on Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks. Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us/philippines/uzbekistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us/philippines/uzbekistan/">Philippines vs Uzbekistan: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)
Unit
constant 2015 US$
Source
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
240 places, 10,644 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing corresponds to ISIC (Rev. 4) divisions 01-03 and includes the exploitation of vegetal and animal natural resources, comprising the activities of growing of crops, raising and breeding of animals, harvesting of timber and other plants, animals or animal products from a farm or their natural habitats.Value added is the contribution to the economy by a producer or an industry or an institutional sector, which is estimated by the total value of output produced and deducting the total value of intermediate consumption of goods and services used to produce that output. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment is 2015. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.