Peru vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added

Peru
18.37 billion constant 2015 US$
in 2025
Tanzania, United Republic of
18.51 billion constant 2015 US$
in 2025
Peru rank
34th
Tanzania, United Republic of rank
33rd

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added over time

  • Peru
  • Tanzania, United Republic of
5.0B10.0B15.0B20.0B196019922025

How they compare

Tanzania, United Republic of currently reports 18.51 billion constant 2015 US$ against 18.37 billion constant 2015 US$ in Peru, a difference of 145.60 million constant 2015 US$.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 36 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Peru ahead.

Peru ranks 34th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 33rd of 194 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Peru averaged higher in 3 and Tanzania, United Republic of in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Peru Tanzania, United Republic of Difference Ahead
1990s 6.22 billion constant 2015 US$ 5.62 billion constant 2015 US$ 602.39 million constant 2015 US$ Peru
2000s 9.64 billion constant 2015 US$ 8.23 billion constant 2015 US$ 1.41 billion constant 2015 US$ Peru
2010s 13.45 billion constant 2015 US$ 12.49 billion constant 2015 US$ 959.73 million constant 2015 US$ Peru
2020s 16.98 billion constant 2015 US$ 16.99 billion constant 2015 US$ 11.48 million constant 2015 US$ Tanzania, United Republic of

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added, Peru or Tanzania, United Republic of?
Tanzania, United Republic of, at 18.51 billion constant 2015 US$ against 18.37 billion constant 2015 US$ in Peru as of 2025.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added between Peru and Tanzania, United Republic of?
145.60 million constant 2015 US$, with Tanzania, United Republic of ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Peru and Tanzania, United Republic of?
36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
How do Peru and Tanzania, United Republic of rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added?
Peru ranks 34th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 33rd of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Peru vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added. Statizoid, drawing on Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks. Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us/peru/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us/peru/tanzania/">Peru vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)
Unit
constant 2015 US$
Source
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
240 places, 10,644 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing corresponds to ISIC (Rev. 4) divisions 01-03 and includes the exploitation of vegetal and animal natural resources, comprising the activities of growing of crops, raising and breeding of animals, harvesting of timber and other plants, animals or animal products from a farm or their natural habitats.Value added is the contribution to the economy by a producer or an industry or an institutional sector, which is estimated by the total value of output produced and deducting the total value of intermediate consumption of goods and services used to produce that output. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment is 2015. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.