Pacific island small states vs South Africa: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added

Pacific island small states
1.47 billion constant 2015 US$
in 2024
South Africa
10.57 billion constant 2015 US$
in 2025
Pacific island small states rank
46th
South Africa rank
49th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added over time

  • Pacific island small states
  • South Africa
2.0B4.0B6.0B8.0B10.0B196019922025

How they compare

South Africa currently reports 10.57 billion constant 2015 US$ against 1.47 billion constant 2015 US$ in Pacific island small states, a difference of 9.10 billion constant 2015 US$.

That makes South Africa's figure about 7.2 times Pacific island small states's.

Across all 22 years both countries report, South Africa has been ahead every year.

Pacific island small states ranks 46th and South Africa ranks 49th of 46 groups.

South Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Pacific island small states South Africa Difference Ahead
2000s 1.12 billion constant 2015 US$ 6.01 billion constant 2015 US$ 4.89 billion constant 2015 US$ South Africa
2010s 1.30 billion constant 2015 US$ 7.66 billion constant 2015 US$ 6.36 billion constant 2015 US$ South Africa
2020s 1.43 billion constant 2015 US$ 9.79 billion constant 2015 US$ 8.36 billion constant 2015 US$ South Africa

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added, Pacific island small states or South Africa?
South Africa, at 10.57 billion constant 2015 US$ against 1.47 billion constant 2015 US$ in Pacific island small states as of 2025.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added between Pacific island small states and South Africa?
9.10 billion constant 2015 US$, with South Africa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Pacific island small states and South Africa?
22 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2024.
How do Pacific island small states and South Africa rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added?
Pacific island small states ranks 46th and South Africa ranks 49th of 46 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Pacific island small states vs South Africa: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added. Statizoid, drawing on Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks. Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us/pacific-island-small-states/south-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us/pacific-island-small-states/south-africa/">Pacific island small states vs South Africa: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)
Unit
constant 2015 US$
Source
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
240 places, 10,644 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing corresponds to ISIC (Rev. 4) divisions 01-03 and includes the exploitation of vegetal and animal natural resources, comprising the activities of growing of crops, raising and breeding of animals, harvesting of timber and other plants, animals or animal products from a farm or their natural habitats.Value added is the contribution to the economy by a producer or an industry or an institutional sector, which is estimated by the total value of output produced and deducting the total value of intermediate consumption of goods and services used to produce that output. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment is 2015. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.