Mauritania vs Mongolia: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added

Mauritania
1.83 billion constant 2015 US$
in 2025
Mongolia
1.87 billion constant 2015 US$
in 2025
Mauritania rank
111th
Mongolia rank
110th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added over time

  • Mauritania
  • Mongolia
500.0M1.0B1.5B2.0B196119932025

How they compare

Mongolia currently reports 1.87 billion constant 2015 US$ against 1.83 billion constant 2015 US$ in Mauritania, a difference of 40.10 million constant 2015 US$.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 45 shared years of data; in 1981 it was Mauritania ahead.

Mauritania ranks 111th and Mongolia ranks 110th of 194 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Mauritania averaged higher in 3 and Mongolia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mauritania Mongolia Difference Ahead
1980s 923.13 million constant 2015 US$ 784.12 million constant 2015 US$ 139.01 million constant 2015 US$ Mauritania
1990s 1.09 billion constant 2015 US$ 910.29 million constant 2015 US$ 178.20 million constant 2015 US$ Mauritania
2000s 989.21 million constant 2015 US$ 831.50 million constant 2015 US$ 157.71 million constant 2015 US$ Mauritania
2010s 1.31 billion constant 2015 US$ 1.45 billion constant 2015 US$ 136.44 million constant 2015 US$ Mongolia
2020s 1.68 billion constant 2015 US$ 1.89 billion constant 2015 US$ 216.25 million constant 2015 US$ Mongolia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added, Mauritania or Mongolia?
Mongolia, at 1.87 billion constant 2015 US$ against 1.83 billion constant 2015 US$ in Mauritania as of 2025.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added between Mauritania and Mongolia?
40.10 million constant 2015 US$, with Mongolia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritania and Mongolia?
45 years are reported by both, from 1981 to 2025.
How do Mauritania and Mongolia rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added?
Mauritania ranks 111th and Mongolia ranks 110th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mauritania vs Mongolia: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added. Statizoid, drawing on Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks. Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us/mauritania/mongolia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us/mauritania/mongolia/">Mauritania vs Mongolia: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)
Unit
constant 2015 US$
Source
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
240 places, 10,644 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing corresponds to ISIC (Rev. 4) divisions 01-03 and includes the exploitation of vegetal and animal natural resources, comprising the activities of growing of crops, raising and breeding of animals, harvesting of timber and other plants, animals or animal products from a farm or their natural habitats.Value added is the contribution to the economy by a producer or an industry or an institutional sector, which is estimated by the total value of output produced and deducting the total value of intermediate consumption of goods and services used to produce that output. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment is 2015. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.