Latvia vs Namibia: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added

Latvia
891.35 million constant 2015 US$
in 2025
Namibia
797.20 million constant 2015 US$
in 2025
Latvia rank
133rd
Namibia rank
136th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added over time

  • Latvia
  • Namibia
0250.0M500.0M750.0M1.0B198020022025

How they compare

Latvia currently reports 891.35 million constant 2015 US$ against 797.20 million constant 2015 US$ in Namibia, a difference of 94.15 million constant 2015 US$.

That makes Latvia's figure about 1.1 times Namibia's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Namibia ahead.

Latvia ranks 133rd and Namibia ranks 136th of 194 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Latvia averaged higher in 2 and Namibia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Latvia Namibia Difference Ahead
1990s 567.84 million constant 2015 US$ 703.93 million constant 2015 US$ 136.09 million constant 2015 US$ Namibia
2000s 736.84 million constant 2015 US$ 898.23 million constant 2015 US$ 161.39 million constant 2015 US$ Namibia
2010s 892.40 million constant 2015 US$ 840.38 million constant 2015 US$ 52.01 million constant 2015 US$ Latvia
2020s 957.04 million constant 2015 US$ 842.88 million constant 2015 US$ 114.15 million constant 2015 US$ Latvia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added, Latvia or Namibia?
Latvia, at 891.35 million constant 2015 US$ against 797.20 million constant 2015 US$ in Namibia as of 2025.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added between Latvia and Namibia?
94.15 million constant 2015 US$, with Latvia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Namibia?
31 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2025.
How do Latvia and Namibia rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added?
Latvia ranks 133rd and Namibia ranks 136th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Latvia vs Namibia: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added. Statizoid, drawing on Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks. Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us/latvia/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us/latvia/namibia/">Latvia vs Namibia: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)
Unit
constant 2015 US$
Source
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
240 places, 10,644 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing corresponds to ISIC (Rev. 4) divisions 01-03 and includes the exploitation of vegetal and animal natural resources, comprising the activities of growing of crops, raising and breeding of animals, harvesting of timber and other plants, animals or animal products from a farm or their natural habitats.Value added is the contribution to the economy by a producer or an industry or an institutional sector, which is estimated by the total value of output produced and deducting the total value of intermediate consumption of goods and services used to produce that output. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment is 2015. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.