Kyrgyzstan vs Moldova: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)

Kyrgyzstan
1.17 billion constant 2015 US$
in 2025
Moldova
1.10 billion constant 2015 US$
in 2025
Kyrgyzstan rank
126th
Moldova rank
129th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) over time

  • Kyrgyzstan
  • Moldova
0500.0M1.0B1.5B198720062025

How they compare

Kyrgyzstan currently reports 1.17 billion constant 2015 US$ against 1.10 billion constant 2015 US$ in Moldova, a difference of 70.00 million constant 2015 US$.

That makes Kyrgyzstan's figure about 1.1 times Moldova's.

The two have swapped places 11 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Moldova ahead.

Kyrgyzstan ranks 126th and Moldova ranks 129th of 194 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Kyrgyzstan averaged higher in 1 and Moldova in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kyrgyzstan Moldova Difference Ahead
1990s 572.56 million constant 2015 US$ 841.76 million constant 2015 US$ 269.20 million constant 2015 US$ Moldova
2000s 778.59 million constant 2015 US$ 872.95 million constant 2015 US$ 94.36 million constant 2015 US$ Moldova
2010s 928.05 million constant 2015 US$ 1.05 billion constant 2015 US$ 122.17 million constant 2015 US$ Moldova
2020s 1.09 billion constant 2015 US$ 1.06 billion constant 2015 US$ 25.18 million constant 2015 US$ Kyrgyzstan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added, Kyrgyzstan or Moldova?
Kyrgyzstan, at 1.17 billion constant 2015 US$ against 1.10 billion constant 2015 US$ in Moldova as of 2025.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added between Kyrgyzstan and Moldova?
70.00 million constant 2015 US$, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and Moldova?
31 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2025.
How do Kyrgyzstan and Moldova rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added?
Kyrgyzstan ranks 126th and Moldova ranks 129th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Kyrgyzstan vs Moldova: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added. Statizoid, drawing on Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks. Retrieved 07 November 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us/kyrgyz-republic/moldova/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us/kyrgyz-republic/moldova/">Kyrgyzstan vs Moldova: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)
Unit
constant 2015 US$
Source
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
240 places, 10,644 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing corresponds to ISIC (Rev. 4) divisions 01-03 and includes the exploitation of vegetal and animal natural resources, comprising the activities of growing of crops, raising and breeding of animals, harvesting of timber and other plants, animals or animal products from a farm or their natural habitats.Value added is the contribution to the economy by a producer or an industry or an institutional sector, which is estimated by the total value of output produced and deducting the total value of intermediate consumption of goods and services used to produce that output. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment is 2015. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.