South Korea vs Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income): Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) over time
- South Korea
- Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)
How they compare
Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) currently reports 379.82 billion constant 2015 US$ against 27.52 billion constant 2015 US$ in South Korea, a difference of 352.30 billion constant 2015 US$.
That makes Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)'s figure about 13.8 times South Korea's.
Across all 45 years both countries report, Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) has been ahead every year.
South Korea ranks 25th and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) ranks 22nd of 194 countries.
Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | South Korea | Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 18.58 billion constant 2015 US$ | 86.19 billion constant 2015 US$ | 67.61 billion constant 2015 US$ | Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) |
| 1990s | 22.02 billion constant 2015 US$ | 113.76 billion constant 2015 US$ | 91.73 billion constant 2015 US$ | Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) |
| 2000s | 24.36 billion constant 2015 US$ | 178.60 billion constant 2015 US$ | 154.25 billion constant 2015 US$ | Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) |
| 2010s | 27.78 billion constant 2015 US$ | 270.67 billion constant 2015 US$ | 242.89 billion constant 2015 US$ | Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) |
| 2020s | 27.11 billion constant 2015 US$ | 350.01 billion constant 2015 US$ | 322.91 billion constant 2015 US$ | Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added, South Korea or Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)?
- Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income), at 379.82 billion constant 2015 US$ against 27.52 billion constant 2015 US$ in South Korea as of 2025.
- What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added between South Korea and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)?
- 352.30 billion constant 2015 US$, with Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for South Korea and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)?
- 45 years are reported by both, from 1981 to 2025.
- How do South Korea and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added?
- South Korea ranks 25th and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) ranks 22nd of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing corresponds to ISIC (Rev. 4) divisions 01-03 and includes the exploitation of vegetal and animal natural resources, comprising the activities of growing of crops, raising and breeding of animals, harvesting of timber and other plants, animals or animal products from a farm or their natural habitats.Value added is the contribution to the economy by a producer or an industry or an institutional sector, which is estimated by the total value of output produced and deducting the total value of intermediate consumption of goods and services used to produce that output. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment is 2015. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.