Kiribati vs Tonga: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added

Kiribati
58.82 million constant 2015 US$
in 2024
Tonga
65.62 million constant 2015 US$
in 2024
Kiribati rank
179th
Tonga rank
177th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added over time

  • Kiribati
  • Tonga
20.0M40.0M60.0M80.0M197519992024

How they compare

Tonga currently reports 65.62 million constant 2015 US$ against 58.82 million constant 2015 US$ in Kiribati, a difference of 6.79 million constant 2015 US$.

That makes Tonga's figure about 1.1 times Kiribati's.

Across all 46 years both countries report, Tonga has been ahead every year.

Kiribati ranks 179th and Tonga ranks 177th of 194 countries.

Tonga has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kiribati Tonga Difference Ahead
1970s 40.77 million constant 2015 US$ 58.80 million constant 2015 US$ 18.04 million constant 2015 US$ Tonga
1980s 34.59 million constant 2015 US$ 60.57 million constant 2015 US$ 25.99 million constant 2015 US$ Tonga
1990s 44.59 million constant 2015 US$ 69.11 million constant 2015 US$ 24.53 million constant 2015 US$ Tonga
2000s 38.83 million constant 2015 US$ 68.21 million constant 2015 US$ 29.37 million constant 2015 US$ Tonga
2010s 48.42 million constant 2015 US$ 71.29 million constant 2015 US$ 22.87 million constant 2015 US$ Tonga
2020s 59.17 million constant 2015 US$ 74.62 million constant 2015 US$ 15.45 million constant 2015 US$ Tonga

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added, Kiribati or Tonga?
Tonga, at 65.62 million constant 2015 US$ against 58.82 million constant 2015 US$ in Kiribati as of 2024.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added between Kiribati and Tonga?
6.79 million constant 2015 US$, with Tonga ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and Tonga?
46 years are reported by both, from 1979 to 2024.
How do Kiribati and Tonga rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added?
Kiribati ranks 179th and Tonga ranks 177th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Kiribati vs Tonga: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added. Statizoid, drawing on Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks. Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us/kiribati/tonga/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us/kiribati/tonga/">Kiribati vs Tonga: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)
Unit
constant 2015 US$
Source
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
240 places, 10,644 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing corresponds to ISIC (Rev. 4) divisions 01-03 and includes the exploitation of vegetal and animal natural resources, comprising the activities of growing of crops, raising and breeding of animals, harvesting of timber and other plants, animals or animal products from a farm or their natural habitats.Value added is the contribution to the economy by a producer or an industry or an institutional sector, which is estimated by the total value of output produced and deducting the total value of intermediate consumption of goods and services used to produce that output. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment is 2015. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.