IDA blend vs Malaysia: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added

IDA blend
309.19 billion constant 2015 US$
in 2025
Malaysia
27.06 billion constant 2015 US$
in 2025
IDA blend rank
28th
Malaysia rank
26th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added over time

  • IDA blend
  • Malaysia
0100.0B200.0B300.0B197019972025

How they compare

IDA blend currently reports 309.19 billion constant 2015 US$ against 27.06 billion constant 2015 US$ in Malaysia, a difference of 282.13 billion constant 2015 US$.

That makes IDA blend's figure about 11.4 times Malaysia's.

Across all 45 years both countries report, IDA blend has been ahead every year.

IDA blend ranks 28th and Malaysia ranks 26th of 46 groups.

IDA blend has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade IDA blend Malaysia Difference Ahead
1980s 66.88 billion constant 2015 US$ 13.20 billion constant 2015 US$ 53.68 billion constant 2015 US$ IDA blend
1990s 93.27 billion constant 2015 US$ 15.54 billion constant 2015 US$ 77.73 billion constant 2015 US$ IDA blend
2000s 151.75 billion constant 2015 US$ 18.85 billion constant 2015 US$ 132.90 billion constant 2015 US$ IDA blend
2010s 227.17 billion constant 2015 US$ 24.38 billion constant 2015 US$ 202.79 billion constant 2015 US$ IDA blend
2020s 287.74 billion constant 2015 US$ 25.93 billion constant 2015 US$ 261.81 billion constant 2015 US$ IDA blend

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added, IDA blend or Malaysia?
IDA blend, at 309.19 billion constant 2015 US$ against 27.06 billion constant 2015 US$ in Malaysia as of 2025.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added between IDA blend and Malaysia?
282.13 billion constant 2015 US$, with IDA blend ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for IDA blend and Malaysia?
45 years are reported by both, from 1981 to 2025.
How do IDA blend and Malaysia rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added?
IDA blend ranks 28th and Malaysia ranks 26th of 46 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

IDA blend vs Malaysia: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added. Statizoid, drawing on Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks. Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us/ida-blend/malaysia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us/ida-blend/malaysia/">IDA blend vs Malaysia: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)
Unit
constant 2015 US$
Source
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
240 places, 10,644 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing corresponds to ISIC (Rev. 4) divisions 01-03 and includes the exploitation of vegetal and animal natural resources, comprising the activities of growing of crops, raising and breeding of animals, harvesting of timber and other plants, animals or animal products from a farm or their natural habitats.Value added is the contribution to the economy by a producer or an industry or an institutional sector, which is estimated by the total value of output produced and deducting the total value of intermediate consumption of goods and services used to produce that output. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment is 2015. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.