Hong Kong, China vs Lesotho: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added

Hong Kong, China
158.22 million constant 2015 US$
in 2025
Lesotho
138.38 million constant 2015 US$
in 2025
Hong Kong, China rank
162nd
Lesotho rank
164th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added over time

  • Hong Kong, China
  • Lesotho
100.0M200.0M300.0M197019972025

How they compare

Hong Kong, China currently reports 158.22 million constant 2015 US$ against 138.38 million constant 2015 US$ in Lesotho, a difference of 19.83 million constant 2015 US$.

That makes Hong Kong, China's figure about 1.1 times Lesotho's.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Hong Kong, China has been ahead every year.

Hong Kong, China ranks 162nd and Lesotho ranks 164th of 194 countries.

Hong Kong, China has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Hong Kong, China Lesotho Difference Ahead
2000s 296.11 million constant 2015 US$ 91.31 million constant 2015 US$ 204.79 million constant 2015 US$ Hong Kong, China
2010s 215.99 million constant 2015 US$ 98.88 million constant 2015 US$ 117.11 million constant 2015 US$ Hong Kong, China
2020s 173.97 million constant 2015 US$ 127.28 million constant 2015 US$ 46.69 million constant 2015 US$ Hong Kong, China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added, Hong Kong, China or Lesotho?
Hong Kong, China, at 158.22 million constant 2015 US$ against 138.38 million constant 2015 US$ in Lesotho as of 2025.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added between Hong Kong, China and Lesotho?
19.83 million constant 2015 US$, with Hong Kong, China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong, China and Lesotho?
26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
How do Hong Kong, China and Lesotho rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added?
Hong Kong, China ranks 162nd and Lesotho ranks 164th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Hong Kong, China vs Lesotho: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added. Statizoid, drawing on Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks. Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us/hong-kong-sar-china/lesotho/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us/hong-kong-sar-china/lesotho/">Hong Kong, China vs Lesotho: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)
Unit
constant 2015 US$
Source
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
240 places, 10,644 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing corresponds to ISIC (Rev. 4) divisions 01-03 and includes the exploitation of vegetal and animal natural resources, comprising the activities of growing of crops, raising and breeding of animals, harvesting of timber and other plants, animals or animal products from a farm or their natural habitats.Value added is the contribution to the economy by a producer or an industry or an institutional sector, which is estimated by the total value of output produced and deducting the total value of intermediate consumption of goods and services used to produce that output. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment is 2015. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.