Guinea-Bissau vs Mauritius: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added

Guinea-Bissau
613.90 million constant 2015 US$
in 2025
Mauritius
575.35 million constant 2015 US$
in 2025
Guinea-Bissau rank
140th
Mauritius rank
143rd

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added over time

  • Guinea-Bissau
  • Mauritius
200.0M300.0M400.0M500.0M600.0M197620002025

How they compare

Guinea-Bissau currently reports 613.90 million constant 2015 US$ against 575.35 million constant 2015 US$ in Mauritius, a difference of 38.55 million constant 2015 US$.

That makes Guinea-Bissau's figure about 1.1 times Mauritius's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 29 shared years of data; in 1997 it was Mauritius ahead.

Guinea-Bissau ranks 140th and Mauritius ranks 143rd of 194 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Guinea-Bissau averaged higher in 2 and Mauritius in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guinea-Bissau Mauritius Difference Ahead
1990s 259.85 million constant 2015 US$ 290.01 million constant 2015 US$ 30.16 million constant 2015 US$ Mauritius
2000s 301.61 million constant 2015 US$ 309.60 million constant 2015 US$ 7.99 million constant 2015 US$ Mauritius
2010s 414.60 million constant 2015 US$ 366.58 million constant 2015 US$ 48.02 million constant 2015 US$ Guinea-Bissau
2020s 551.15 million constant 2015 US$ 472.74 million constant 2015 US$ 78.40 million constant 2015 US$ Guinea-Bissau

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added, Guinea-Bissau or Mauritius?
Guinea-Bissau, at 613.90 million constant 2015 US$ against 575.35 million constant 2015 US$ in Mauritius as of 2025.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added between Guinea-Bissau and Mauritius?
38.55 million constant 2015 US$, with Guinea-Bissau ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea-Bissau and Mauritius?
29 years are reported by both, from 1997 to 2025.
How do Guinea-Bissau and Mauritius rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added?
Guinea-Bissau ranks 140th and Mauritius ranks 143rd of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guinea-Bissau vs Mauritius: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added. Statizoid, drawing on Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks. Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us/guinea-bissau/mauritius/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us/guinea-bissau/mauritius/">Guinea-Bissau vs Mauritius: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)
Unit
constant 2015 US$
Source
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
240 places, 10,644 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing corresponds to ISIC (Rev. 4) divisions 01-03 and includes the exploitation of vegetal and animal natural resources, comprising the activities of growing of crops, raising and breeding of animals, harvesting of timber and other plants, animals or animal products from a farm or their natural habitats.Value added is the contribution to the economy by a producer or an industry or an institutional sector, which is estimated by the total value of output produced and deducting the total value of intermediate consumption of goods and services used to produce that output. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment is 2015. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.