Guatemala vs Nepal: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added

Guatemala
7.52 billion constant 2015 US$
in 2025
Nepal
8.65 billion constant 2015 US$
in 2025
Guatemala rank
54th
Nepal rank
53rd

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added over time

  • Guatemala
  • Nepal
2.0B4.0B6.0B8.0B196019922025

How they compare

Nepal currently reports 8.65 billion constant 2015 US$ against 7.52 billion constant 2015 US$ in Guatemala, a difference of 1.12 billion constant 2015 US$.

That makes Nepal's figure about 1.1 times Guatemala's.

The two have swapped places 12 times across 61 shared years of data; in 1965 it was Nepal ahead.

Guatemala ranks 54th and Nepal ranks 53rd of 194 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Guatemala averaged higher in 3 and Nepal in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guatemala Nepal Difference Ahead
1960s 1.45 billion constant 2015 US$ 1.83 billion constant 2015 US$ 380.39 million constant 2015 US$ Nepal
1970s 2.19 billion constant 2015 US$ 2.03 billion constant 2015 US$ 154.74 million constant 2015 US$ Guatemala
1980s 2.65 billion constant 2015 US$ 2.48 billion constant 2015 US$ 175.40 million constant 2015 US$ Guatemala
1990s 3.41 billion constant 2015 US$ 3.40 billion constant 2015 US$ 16.10 million constant 2015 US$ Guatemala
2000s 4.53 billion constant 2015 US$ 4.66 billion constant 2015 US$ 133.24 million constant 2015 US$ Nepal
2010s 6.09 billion constant 2015 US$ 6.37 billion constant 2015 US$ 285.52 million constant 2015 US$ Nepal
2020s 7.26 billion constant 2015 US$ 8.05 billion constant 2015 US$ 785.48 million constant 2015 US$ Nepal

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added, Guatemala or Nepal?
Nepal, at 8.65 billion constant 2015 US$ against 7.52 billion constant 2015 US$ in Guatemala as of 2025.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added between Guatemala and Nepal?
1.12 billion constant 2015 US$, with Nepal ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Nepal?
61 years are reported by both, from 1965 to 2025.
How do Guatemala and Nepal rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added?
Guatemala ranks 54th and Nepal ranks 53rd of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guatemala vs Nepal: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added. Statizoid, drawing on Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks. Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us/guatemala/nepal/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us/guatemala/nepal/">Guatemala vs Nepal: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)
Unit
constant 2015 US$
Source
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
240 places, 10,644 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing corresponds to ISIC (Rev. 4) divisions 01-03 and includes the exploitation of vegetal and animal natural resources, comprising the activities of growing of crops, raising and breeding of animals, harvesting of timber and other plants, animals or animal products from a farm or their natural habitats.Value added is the contribution to the economy by a producer or an industry or an institutional sector, which is estimated by the total value of output produced and deducting the total value of intermediate consumption of goods and services used to produce that output. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment is 2015. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.