Grenada vs Kiribati: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added

Grenada
34.91 million constant 2015 US$
in 2025
Kiribati
58.82 million constant 2015 US$
in 2024
Grenada rank
182nd
Kiribati rank
179th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added over time

  • Grenada
  • Kiribati
20.0M40.0M60.0M80.0M197720012025

How they compare

Kiribati currently reports 58.82 million constant 2015 US$ against 34.91 million constant 2015 US$ in Grenada, a difference of 23.91 million constant 2015 US$.

That makes Kiribati's figure about 1.7 times Grenada's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 46 shared years of data; in 1979 it was Grenada ahead.

Grenada ranks 182nd and Kiribati ranks 179th of 194 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Grenada averaged higher in 3 and Kiribati in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Grenada Kiribati Difference Ahead
1970s 47.43 million constant 2015 US$ 40.77 million constant 2015 US$ 6.67 million constant 2015 US$ Grenada
1980s 48.24 million constant 2015 US$ 34.59 million constant 2015 US$ 13.65 million constant 2015 US$ Grenada
1990s 43.74 million constant 2015 US$ 44.59 million constant 2015 US$ 845,060 constant 2015 US$ Kiribati
2000s 37.37 million constant 2015 US$ 38.83 million constant 2015 US$ 1.47 million constant 2015 US$ Kiribati
2010s 51.38 million constant 2015 US$ 48.42 million constant 2015 US$ 2.96 million constant 2015 US$ Grenada
2020s 44.31 million constant 2015 US$ 59.17 million constant 2015 US$ 14.86 million constant 2015 US$ Kiribati

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added, Grenada or Kiribati?
Kiribati, at 58.82 million constant 2015 US$ against 34.91 million constant 2015 US$ in Grenada as of 2024.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added between Grenada and Kiribati?
23.91 million constant 2015 US$, with Kiribati ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Grenada and Kiribati?
46 years are reported by both, from 1979 to 2024.
How do Grenada and Kiribati rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added?
Grenada ranks 182nd and Kiribati ranks 179th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Grenada vs Kiribati: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added. Statizoid, drawing on Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks. Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us/grenada/kiribati/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us/grenada/kiribati/">Grenada vs Kiribati: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)
Unit
constant 2015 US$
Source
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
240 places, 10,644 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing corresponds to ISIC (Rev. 4) divisions 01-03 and includes the exploitation of vegetal and animal natural resources, comprising the activities of growing of crops, raising and breeding of animals, harvesting of timber and other plants, animals or animal products from a farm or their natural habitats.Value added is the contribution to the economy by a producer or an industry or an institutional sector, which is estimated by the total value of output produced and deducting the total value of intermediate consumption of goods and services used to produce that output. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment is 2015. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.