Gabon vs Kyrgyzstan: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added

Gabon
1.27 billion constant 2015 US$
in 2025
Kyrgyzstan
1.17 billion constant 2015 US$
in 2025
Gabon rank
123rd
Kyrgyzstan rank
126th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added over time

  • Gabon
  • Kyrgyzstan
400.0M600.0M800.0M1.0B1.2B198020022025

How they compare

Gabon currently reports 1.27 billion constant 2015 US$ against 1.17 billion constant 2015 US$ in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 93.88 million constant 2015 US$.

That makes Gabon's figure about 1.1 times Kyrgyzstan's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 39 shared years of data; in 1987 it was Kyrgyzstan ahead.

Gabon ranks 123rd and Kyrgyzstan ranks 126th of 194 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Gabon averaged higher in 1 and Kyrgyzstan in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Gabon Kyrgyzstan Difference Ahead
1980s 382.16 million constant 2015 US$ 581.84 million constant 2015 US$ 199.68 million constant 2015 US$ Kyrgyzstan
1990s 410.88 million constant 2015 US$ 561.53 million constant 2015 US$ 150.65 million constant 2015 US$ Kyrgyzstan
2000s 496.84 million constant 2015 US$ 778.59 million constant 2015 US$ 281.75 million constant 2015 US$ Kyrgyzstan
2010s 639.60 million constant 2015 US$ 928.05 million constant 2015 US$ 288.45 million constant 2015 US$ Kyrgyzstan
2020s 1.20 billion constant 2015 US$ 1.09 billion constant 2015 US$ 110.73 million constant 2015 US$ Gabon

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added, Gabon or Kyrgyzstan?
Gabon, at 1.27 billion constant 2015 US$ against 1.17 billion constant 2015 US$ in Kyrgyzstan as of 2025.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added between Gabon and Kyrgyzstan?
93.88 million constant 2015 US$, with Gabon ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Gabon and Kyrgyzstan?
39 years are reported by both, from 1987 to 2025.
How do Gabon and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added?
Gabon ranks 123rd and Kyrgyzstan ranks 126th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Gabon vs Kyrgyzstan: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added. Statizoid, drawing on Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks. Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us/gabon/kyrgyz-republic/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us/gabon/kyrgyz-republic/">Gabon vs Kyrgyzstan: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)
Unit
constant 2015 US$
Source
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
240 places, 10,644 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing corresponds to ISIC (Rev. 4) divisions 01-03 and includes the exploitation of vegetal and animal natural resources, comprising the activities of growing of crops, raising and breeding of animals, harvesting of timber and other plants, animals or animal products from a farm or their natural habitats.Value added is the contribution to the economy by a producer or an industry or an institutional sector, which is estimated by the total value of output produced and deducting the total value of intermediate consumption of goods and services used to produce that output. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment is 2015. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.