Europe & Central Asia vs Italy: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added

Europe & Central Asia
464.96 billion constant 2015 US$
in 2025
Italy
33.91 billion constant 2015 US$
in 2025
Europe & Central Asia rank
19th
Italy rank
22nd

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added over time

  • Europe & Central Asia
  • Italy
0100.0B200.0B300.0B400.0B500.0B199020072025

How they compare

Europe & Central Asia currently reports 464.96 billion constant 2015 US$ against 33.91 billion constant 2015 US$ in Italy, a difference of 431.05 billion constant 2015 US$.

That makes Europe & Central Asia's figure about 13.7 times Italy's.

Across all 36 years both countries report, Europe & Central Asia has been ahead every year.

Europe & Central Asia ranks 19th and Italy ranks 22nd of 46 groups.

Europe & Central Asia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Europe & Central Asia Italy Difference Ahead
1990s 333.07 billion constant 2015 US$ 33.67 billion constant 2015 US$ 299.41 billion constant 2015 US$ Europe & Central Asia
2000s 363.95 billion constant 2015 US$ 36.34 billion constant 2015 US$ 327.61 billion constant 2015 US$ Europe & Central Asia
2010s 420.93 billion constant 2015 US$ 36.00 billion constant 2015 US$ 384.92 billion constant 2015 US$ Europe & Central Asia
2020s 461.53 billion constant 2015 US$ 33.92 billion constant 2015 US$ 427.61 billion constant 2015 US$ Europe & Central Asia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added, Europe & Central Asia or Italy?
Europe & Central Asia, at 464.96 billion constant 2015 US$ against 33.91 billion constant 2015 US$ in Italy as of 2025.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added between Europe & Central Asia and Italy?
431.05 billion constant 2015 US$, with Europe & Central Asia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Europe & Central Asia and Italy?
36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
How do Europe & Central Asia and Italy rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added?
Europe & Central Asia ranks 19th and Italy ranks 22nd of 46 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Europe & Central Asia vs Italy: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added. Statizoid, drawing on Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks. Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us/europe-and-central-asia/italy/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us/europe-and-central-asia/italy/">Europe & Central Asia vs Italy: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)
Unit
constant 2015 US$
Source
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
240 places, 10,644 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing corresponds to ISIC (Rev. 4) divisions 01-03 and includes the exploitation of vegetal and animal natural resources, comprising the activities of growing of crops, raising and breeding of animals, harvesting of timber and other plants, animals or animal products from a farm or their natural habitats.Value added is the contribution to the economy by a producer or an industry or an institutional sector, which is estimated by the total value of output produced and deducting the total value of intermediate consumption of goods and services used to produce that output. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment is 2015. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.