Ethiopia vs South Asia: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added

Ethiopia
38.11 billion constant 2015 US$
in 2025
South Asia
587.10 billion constant 2015 US$
in 2025
Ethiopia rank
17th
South Asia rank
16th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added over time

  • Ethiopia
  • South Asia
0200.0B400.0B600.0B196019922025

How they compare

South Asia currently reports 587.10 billion constant 2015 US$ against 38.11 billion constant 2015 US$ in Ethiopia, a difference of 548.99 billion constant 2015 US$.

That makes South Asia's figure about 15.4 times Ethiopia's.

Across all 45 years both countries report, South Asia has been ahead every year.

Ethiopia ranks 17th and South Asia ranks 16th of 194 countries.

South Asia has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ethiopia South Asia Difference Ahead
1980s 6.23 billion constant 2015 US$ 159.97 billion constant 2015 US$ 153.74 billion constant 2015 US$ South Asia
1990s 7.83 billion constant 2015 US$ 215.25 billion constant 2015 US$ 207.42 billion constant 2015 US$ South Asia
2000s 11.31 billion constant 2015 US$ 279.46 billion constant 2015 US$ 268.14 billion constant 2015 US$ South Asia
2010s 21.68 billion constant 2015 US$ 393.45 billion constant 2015 US$ 371.77 billion constant 2015 US$ South Asia
2020s 32.56 billion constant 2015 US$ 540.06 billion constant 2015 US$ 507.50 billion constant 2015 US$ South Asia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added, Ethiopia or South Asia?
South Asia, at 587.10 billion constant 2015 US$ against 38.11 billion constant 2015 US$ in Ethiopia as of 2025.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added between Ethiopia and South Asia?
548.99 billion constant 2015 US$, with South Asia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ethiopia and South Asia?
45 years are reported by both, from 1981 to 2025.
How do Ethiopia and South Asia rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added?
Ethiopia ranks 17th and South Asia ranks 16th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ethiopia vs South Asia: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added. Statizoid, drawing on Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks. Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us/ethiopia/south-asia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us/ethiopia/south-asia/">Ethiopia vs South Asia: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)
Unit
constant 2015 US$
Source
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
240 places, 10,644 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing corresponds to ISIC (Rev. 4) divisions 01-03 and includes the exploitation of vegetal and animal natural resources, comprising the activities of growing of crops, raising and breeding of animals, harvesting of timber and other plants, animals or animal products from a farm or their natural habitats.Value added is the contribution to the economy by a producer or an industry or an institutional sector, which is estimated by the total value of output produced and deducting the total value of intermediate consumption of goods and services used to produce that output. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment is 2015. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.