Ethiopia vs Philippines: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added

Ethiopia
38.11 billion constant 2015 US$
in 2025
Philippines
36.58 billion constant 2015 US$
in 2025
Ethiopia rank
17th
Philippines rank
18th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added over time

  • Ethiopia
  • Philippines
010.0B20.0B30.0B40.0B196019922025

How they compare

Ethiopia currently reports 38.11 billion constant 2015 US$ against 36.58 billion constant 2015 US$ in Philippines, a difference of 1.53 billion constant 2015 US$.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 45 shared years of data; in 1981 it was Philippines ahead.

Ethiopia ranks 17th and Philippines ranks 18th of 194 countries.

Philippines has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ethiopia Philippines Difference Ahead
1980s 6.23 billion constant 2015 US$ 16.42 billion constant 2015 US$ 10.19 billion constant 2015 US$ Philippines
1990s 7.83 billion constant 2015 US$ 18.84 billion constant 2015 US$ 11.00 billion constant 2015 US$ Philippines
2000s 11.31 billion constant 2015 US$ 25.60 billion constant 2015 US$ 14.29 billion constant 2015 US$ Philippines
2010s 21.68 billion constant 2015 US$ 33.17 billion constant 2015 US$ 11.49 billion constant 2015 US$ Philippines
2020s 32.56 billion constant 2015 US$ 35.78 billion constant 2015 US$ 3.22 billion constant 2015 US$ Philippines

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added, Ethiopia or Philippines?
Ethiopia, at 38.11 billion constant 2015 US$ against 36.58 billion constant 2015 US$ in Philippines as of 2025.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added between Ethiopia and Philippines?
1.53 billion constant 2015 US$, with Ethiopia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ethiopia and Philippines?
45 years are reported by both, from 1981 to 2025.
How do Ethiopia and Philippines rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added?
Ethiopia ranks 17th and Philippines ranks 18th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ethiopia vs Philippines: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added. Statizoid, drawing on Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks. Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us/ethiopia/philippines/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us/ethiopia/philippines/">Ethiopia vs Philippines: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)
Unit
constant 2015 US$
Source
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
240 places, 10,644 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing corresponds to ISIC (Rev. 4) divisions 01-03 and includes the exploitation of vegetal and animal natural resources, comprising the activities of growing of crops, raising and breeding of animals, harvesting of timber and other plants, animals or animal products from a farm or their natural habitats.Value added is the contribution to the economy by a producer or an industry or an institutional sector, which is estimated by the total value of output produced and deducting the total value of intermediate consumption of goods and services used to produce that output. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment is 2015. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.