Eswatini vs Suriname: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added

Eswatini
251.15 million constant 2015 US$
in 2025
Suriname
267.63 million constant 2015 US$
in 2024
Eswatini rank
159th
Suriname rank
156th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added over time

  • Eswatini
  • Suriname
100.0M200.0M300.0M400.0M500.0M197119982025

How they compare

Suriname currently reports 267.63 million constant 2015 US$ against 251.15 million constant 2015 US$ in Eswatini, a difference of 16.49 million constant 2015 US$.

That makes Suriname's figure about 1.1 times Eswatini's.

Across all 50 years both countries report, Suriname has been ahead every year.

Eswatini ranks 159th and Suriname ranks 156th of 194 countries.

Suriname has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eswatini Suriname Difference Ahead
1970s 171.24 million constant 2015 US$ 280.01 million constant 2015 US$ 108.76 million constant 2015 US$ Suriname
1980s 180.41 million constant 2015 US$ 334.74 million constant 2015 US$ 154.33 million constant 2015 US$ Suriname
1990s 194.68 million constant 2015 US$ 335.94 million constant 2015 US$ 141.26 million constant 2015 US$ Suriname
2000s 238.20 million constant 2015 US$ 364.40 million constant 2015 US$ 126.20 million constant 2015 US$ Suriname
2010s 282.45 million constant 2015 US$ 487.54 million constant 2015 US$ 205.09 million constant 2015 US$ Suriname
2020s 269.96 million constant 2015 US$ 299.65 million constant 2015 US$ 29.69 million constant 2015 US$ Suriname

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added, Eswatini or Suriname?
Suriname, at 267.63 million constant 2015 US$ against 251.15 million constant 2015 US$ in Eswatini as of 2024.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added between Eswatini and Suriname?
16.49 million constant 2015 US$, with Suriname ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Suriname?
50 years are reported by both, from 1975 to 2024.
How do Eswatini and Suriname rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added?
Eswatini ranks 159th and Suriname ranks 156th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eswatini vs Suriname: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added. Statizoid, drawing on Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks. Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us/eswatini/suriname/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us/eswatini/suriname/">Eswatini vs Suriname: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)
Unit
constant 2015 US$
Source
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
240 places, 10,644 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing corresponds to ISIC (Rev. 4) divisions 01-03 and includes the exploitation of vegetal and animal natural resources, comprising the activities of growing of crops, raising and breeding of animals, harvesting of timber and other plants, animals or animal products from a farm or their natural habitats.Value added is the contribution to the economy by a producer or an industry or an institutional sector, which is estimated by the total value of output produced and deducting the total value of intermediate consumption of goods and services used to produce that output. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment is 2015. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.