Eswatini vs Hong Kong, China: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added

Eswatini
251.15 million constant 2015 US$
in 2025
Hong Kong, China
158.22 million constant 2015 US$
in 2025
Eswatini rank
159th
Hong Kong, China rank
162nd

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added over time

  • Eswatini
  • Hong Kong, China
0100.0M200.0M300.0M197119982025

How they compare

Eswatini currently reports 251.15 million constant 2015 US$ against 158.22 million constant 2015 US$ in Hong Kong, China, a difference of 92.93 million constant 2015 US$.

That makes Eswatini's figure about 1.6 times Hong Kong, China's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Hong Kong, China ahead.

Eswatini ranks 159th and Hong Kong, China ranks 162nd of 194 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 2 and Hong Kong, China in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eswatini Hong Kong, China Difference Ahead
2000s 238.20 million constant 2015 US$ 296.11 million constant 2015 US$ 57.90 million constant 2015 US$ Hong Kong, China
2010s 282.45 million constant 2015 US$ 215.99 million constant 2015 US$ 66.46 million constant 2015 US$ Eswatini
2020s 266.82 million constant 2015 US$ 173.97 million constant 2015 US$ 92.86 million constant 2015 US$ Eswatini

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added, Eswatini or Hong Kong, China?
Eswatini, at 251.15 million constant 2015 US$ against 158.22 million constant 2015 US$ in Hong Kong, China as of 2025.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added between Eswatini and Hong Kong, China?
92.93 million constant 2015 US$, with Eswatini ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Hong Kong, China?
26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
How do Eswatini and Hong Kong, China rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added?
Eswatini ranks 159th and Hong Kong, China ranks 162nd of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eswatini vs Hong Kong, China: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added. Statizoid, drawing on Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks. Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us/eswatini/hong-kong-sar-china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us/eswatini/hong-kong-sar-china/">Eswatini vs Hong Kong, China: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)
Unit
constant 2015 US$
Source
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
240 places, 10,644 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing corresponds to ISIC (Rev. 4) divisions 01-03 and includes the exploitation of vegetal and animal natural resources, comprising the activities of growing of crops, raising and breeding of animals, harvesting of timber and other plants, animals or animal products from a farm or their natural habitats.Value added is the contribution to the economy by a producer or an industry or an institutional sector, which is estimated by the total value of output produced and deducting the total value of intermediate consumption of goods and services used to produce that output. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment is 2015. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.