Egypt vs Mexico: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added

Egypt
52.75 billion constant 2015 US$
in 2025
Mexico
44.44 billion constant 2015 US$
in 2025
Egypt rank
9th
Mexico rank
12th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added over time

  • Egypt
  • Mexico
10.0B20.0B30.0B40.0B50.0B196119932025

How they compare

Egypt currently reports 52.75 billion constant 2015 US$ against 44.44 billion constant 2015 US$ in Mexico, a difference of 8.31 billion constant 2015 US$.

That makes Egypt's figure about 1.2 times Mexico's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 61 shared years of data; in 1965 it was Mexico ahead.

Egypt ranks 9th and Mexico ranks 12th of 194 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Egypt averaged higher in 2 and Mexico in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Egypt Mexico Difference Ahead
1960s 10.06 billion constant 2015 US$ 13.96 billion constant 2015 US$ 3.90 billion constant 2015 US$ Mexico
1970s 11.21 billion constant 2015 US$ 17.38 billion constant 2015 US$ 6.17 billion constant 2015 US$ Mexico
1980s 14.48 billion constant 2015 US$ 22.71 billion constant 2015 US$ 8.23 billion constant 2015 US$ Mexico
1990s 19.39 billion constant 2015 US$ 25.76 billion constant 2015 US$ 6.36 billion constant 2015 US$ Mexico
2000s 27.20 billion constant 2015 US$ 30.97 billion constant 2015 US$ 3.76 billion constant 2015 US$ Mexico
2010s 37.18 billion constant 2015 US$ 37.04 billion constant 2015 US$ 138.60 million constant 2015 US$ Egypt
2020s 48.45 billion constant 2015 US$ 42.69 billion constant 2015 US$ 5.76 billion constant 2015 US$ Egypt

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added, Egypt or Mexico?
Egypt, at 52.75 billion constant 2015 US$ against 44.44 billion constant 2015 US$ in Mexico as of 2025.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added between Egypt and Mexico?
8.31 billion constant 2015 US$, with Egypt ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Egypt and Mexico?
61 years are reported by both, from 1965 to 2025.
How do Egypt and Mexico rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added?
Egypt ranks 9th and Mexico ranks 12th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Egypt vs Mexico: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added. Statizoid, drawing on Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks. Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us/egypt-arab-rep/mexico/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us/egypt-arab-rep/mexico/">Egypt vs Mexico: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)
Unit
constant 2015 US$
Source
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
240 places, 10,644 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing corresponds to ISIC (Rev. 4) divisions 01-03 and includes the exploitation of vegetal and animal natural resources, comprising the activities of growing of crops, raising and breeding of animals, harvesting of timber and other plants, animals or animal products from a farm or their natural habitats.Value added is the contribution to the economy by a producer or an industry or an institutional sector, which is estimated by the total value of output produced and deducting the total value of intermediate consumption of goods and services used to produce that output. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment is 2015. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.