Cuba vs Zambia: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added

Cuba
1.37 billion constant 2015 US$
in 2024
Zambia
1.25 billion constant 2015 US$
in 2025
Cuba rank
122nd
Zambia rank
124th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added over time

  • Cuba
  • Zambia
1.0B2.0B3.0B4.0B5.0B196519952025

How they compare

Cuba currently reports 1.37 billion constant 2015 US$ against 1.25 billion constant 2015 US$ in Zambia, a difference of 115.99 million constant 2015 US$.

That makes Cuba's figure about 1.1 times Zambia's.

Across all 55 years both countries report, Cuba has been ahead every year.

Cuba ranks 122nd and Zambia ranks 124th of 194 countries.

Cuba has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cuba Zambia Difference Ahead
1970s 2.78 billion constant 2015 US$ 772.95 million constant 2015 US$ 2.01 billion constant 2015 US$ Cuba
1980s 4.60 billion constant 2015 US$ 919.37 million constant 2015 US$ 3.68 billion constant 2015 US$ Cuba
1990s 3.01 billion constant 2015 US$ 1.12 billion constant 2015 US$ 1.89 billion constant 2015 US$ Cuba
2000s 3.01 billion constant 2015 US$ 1.21 billion constant 2015 US$ 1.81 billion constant 2015 US$ Cuba
2010s 3.26 billion constant 2015 US$ 1.10 billion constant 2015 US$ 2.16 billion constant 2015 US$ Cuba
2020s 1.94 billion constant 2015 US$ 1.07 billion constant 2015 US$ 862.56 million constant 2015 US$ Cuba

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added, Cuba or Zambia?
Cuba, at 1.37 billion constant 2015 US$ against 1.25 billion constant 2015 US$ in Zambia as of 2024.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added between Cuba and Zambia?
115.99 million constant 2015 US$, with Cuba ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Zambia?
55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.
How do Cuba and Zambia rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added?
Cuba ranks 122nd and Zambia ranks 124th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cuba vs Zambia: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added. Statizoid, drawing on Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks. Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us/cuba/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us/cuba/zambia/">Cuba vs Zambia: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)
Unit
constant 2015 US$
Source
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
240 places, 10,644 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing corresponds to ISIC (Rev. 4) divisions 01-03 and includes the exploitation of vegetal and animal natural resources, comprising the activities of growing of crops, raising and breeding of animals, harvesting of timber and other plants, animals or animal products from a farm or their natural habitats.Value added is the contribution to the economy by a producer or an industry or an institutional sector, which is estimated by the total value of output produced and deducting the total value of intermediate consumption of goods and services used to produce that output. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment is 2015. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.