Congo vs Latvia: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added

Congo
978.16 million constant 2015 US$
in 2025
Latvia
891.35 million constant 2015 US$
in 2025
Congo rank
132nd
Latvia rank
133rd

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added over time

  • Congo
  • Latvia
200.0M400.0M600.0M800.0M1.0B196019922025

How they compare

Congo currently reports 978.16 million constant 2015 US$ against 891.35 million constant 2015 US$ in Latvia, a difference of 86.80 million constant 2015 US$.

That makes Congo's figure about 1.1 times Latvia's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 31 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Latvia ahead.

Congo ranks 132nd and Latvia ranks 133rd of 194 countries.

Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo Latvia Difference Ahead
1990s 376.25 million constant 2015 US$ 567.84 million constant 2015 US$ 191.59 million constant 2015 US$ Latvia
2000s 484.95 million constant 2015 US$ 736.84 million constant 2015 US$ 251.89 million constant 2015 US$ Latvia
2010s 719.76 million constant 2015 US$ 892.40 million constant 2015 US$ 172.63 million constant 2015 US$ Latvia
2020s 900.19 million constant 2015 US$ 957.04 million constant 2015 US$ 56.84 million constant 2015 US$ Latvia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added, Congo or Latvia?
Congo, at 978.16 million constant 2015 US$ against 891.35 million constant 2015 US$ in Latvia as of 2025.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added between Congo and Latvia?
86.80 million constant 2015 US$, with Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Latvia?
31 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2025.
How do Congo and Latvia rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added?
Congo ranks 132nd and Latvia ranks 133rd of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs Latvia: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added. Statizoid, drawing on Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks. Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us/congo-rep/latvia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us/congo-rep/latvia/">Congo vs Latvia: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)
Unit
constant 2015 US$
Source
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
240 places, 10,644 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing corresponds to ISIC (Rev. 4) divisions 01-03 and includes the exploitation of vegetal and animal natural resources, comprising the activities of growing of crops, raising and breeding of animals, harvesting of timber and other plants, animals or animal products from a farm or their natural habitats.Value added is the contribution to the economy by a producer or an industry or an institutional sector, which is estimated by the total value of output produced and deducting the total value of intermediate consumption of goods and services used to produce that output. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment is 2015. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.