Cape Verde vs Singapore: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added

Cape Verde
94.52 million constant 2015 US$
in 2025
Singapore
114.20 million constant 2015 US$
in 2025
Cape Verde rank
171st
Singapore rank
169th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added over time

  • Cape Verde
  • Singapore
0100.0M200.0M300.0M196019922025

How they compare

Singapore currently reports 114.20 million constant 2015 US$ against 94.52 million constant 2015 US$ in Cape Verde, a difference of 19.67 million constant 2015 US$.

That makes Singapore's figure about 1.2 times Cape Verde's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 46 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Singapore ahead.

Cape Verde ranks 171st and Singapore ranks 169th of 194 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Cape Verde averaged higher in 1 and Singapore in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cape Verde Singapore Difference Ahead
1980s 20.43 million constant 2015 US$ 267.16 million constant 2015 US$ 246.73 million constant 2015 US$ Singapore
1990s 35.08 million constant 2015 US$ 146.40 million constant 2015 US$ 111.32 million constant 2015 US$ Singapore
2000s 69.29 million constant 2015 US$ 89.27 million constant 2015 US$ 19.98 million constant 2015 US$ Singapore
2010s 100.29 million constant 2015 US$ 99.24 million constant 2015 US$ 1.05 million constant 2015 US$ Cape Verde
2020s 93.79 million constant 2015 US$ 114.72 million constant 2015 US$ 20.93 million constant 2015 US$ Singapore

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added, Cape Verde or Singapore?
Singapore, at 114.20 million constant 2015 US$ against 94.52 million constant 2015 US$ in Cape Verde as of 2025.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added between Cape Verde and Singapore?
19.67 million constant 2015 US$, with Singapore ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cape Verde and Singapore?
46 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2025.
How do Cape Verde and Singapore rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added?
Cape Verde ranks 171st and Singapore ranks 169th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cape Verde vs Singapore: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added. Statizoid, drawing on Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks. Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us/cabo-verde/singapore/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us/cabo-verde/singapore/">Cape Verde vs Singapore: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)
Unit
constant 2015 US$
Source
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
240 places, 10,644 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing corresponds to ISIC (Rev. 4) divisions 01-03 and includes the exploitation of vegetal and animal natural resources, comprising the activities of growing of crops, raising and breeding of animals, harvesting of timber and other plants, animals or animal products from a farm or their natural habitats.Value added is the contribution to the economy by a producer or an industry or an institutional sector, which is estimated by the total value of output produced and deducting the total value of intermediate consumption of goods and services used to produce that output. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment is 2015. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.