Brunei Darussalam vs Hong Kong, China: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added

Brunei Darussalam
152.20 million constant 2015 US$
in 2025
Hong Kong, China
158.22 million constant 2015 US$
in 2025
Brunei Darussalam rank
163rd
Hong Kong, China rank
162nd

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added over time

  • Brunei Darussalam
  • Hong Kong, China
0100.0M200.0M300.0M197419992025

How they compare

Hong Kong, China currently reports 158.22 million constant 2015 US$ against 152.20 million constant 2015 US$ in Brunei Darussalam, a difference of 6.01 million constant 2015 US$.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Hong Kong, China ahead.

Brunei Darussalam ranks 163rd and Hong Kong, China ranks 162nd of 194 countries.

Hong Kong, China has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Brunei Darussalam Hong Kong, China Difference Ahead
2000s 135.71 million constant 2015 US$ 296.11 million constant 2015 US$ 160.39 million constant 2015 US$ Hong Kong, China
2010s 131.50 million constant 2015 US$ 215.99 million constant 2015 US$ 84.49 million constant 2015 US$ Hong Kong, China
2020s 158.43 million constant 2015 US$ 173.97 million constant 2015 US$ 15.53 million constant 2015 US$ Hong Kong, China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added, Brunei Darussalam or Hong Kong, China?
Hong Kong, China, at 158.22 million constant 2015 US$ against 152.20 million constant 2015 US$ in Brunei Darussalam as of 2025.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added between Brunei Darussalam and Hong Kong, China?
6.01 million constant 2015 US$, with Hong Kong, China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Brunei Darussalam and Hong Kong, China?
26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
How do Brunei Darussalam and Hong Kong, China rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added?
Brunei Darussalam ranks 163rd and Hong Kong, China ranks 162nd of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Brunei Darussalam vs Hong Kong, China: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added. Statizoid, drawing on Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks. Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us/brunei-darussalam/hong-kong-sar-china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us/brunei-darussalam/hong-kong-sar-china/">Brunei Darussalam vs Hong Kong, China: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)
Unit
constant 2015 US$
Source
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
240 places, 10,644 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing corresponds to ISIC (Rev. 4) divisions 01-03 and includes the exploitation of vegetal and animal natural resources, comprising the activities of growing of crops, raising and breeding of animals, harvesting of timber and other plants, animals or animal products from a farm or their natural habitats.Value added is the contribution to the economy by a producer or an industry or an institutional sector, which is estimated by the total value of output produced and deducting the total value of intermediate consumption of goods and services used to produce that output. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment is 2015. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.