Botswana vs Equatorial Guinea: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added

Botswana
310.14 million constant 2015 US$
in 2025
Equatorial Guinea
270.84 million constant 2015 US$
in 2025
Botswana rank
154th
Equatorial Guinea rank
155th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added over time

  • Botswana
  • Equatorial Guinea
100.0M200.0M300.0M196019922025

How they compare

Botswana currently reports 310.14 million constant 2015 US$ against 270.84 million constant 2015 US$ in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 39.30 million constant 2015 US$.

That makes Botswana's figure about 1.1 times Equatorial Guinea's.

Across all 20 years both countries report, Botswana has been ahead every year.

Botswana ranks 154th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 155th of 194 countries.

Botswana has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Botswana Equatorial Guinea Difference Ahead
2000s 260.22 million constant 2015 US$ 161.21 million constant 2015 US$ 99.01 million constant 2015 US$ Botswana
2010s 287.39 million constant 2015 US$ 220.49 million constant 2015 US$ 66.90 million constant 2015 US$ Botswana
2020s 302.56 million constant 2015 US$ 249.37 million constant 2015 US$ 53.20 million constant 2015 US$ Botswana

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added, Botswana or Equatorial Guinea?
Botswana, at 310.14 million constant 2015 US$ against 270.84 million constant 2015 US$ in Equatorial Guinea as of 2025.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added between Botswana and Equatorial Guinea?
39.30 million constant 2015 US$, with Botswana ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Equatorial Guinea?
20 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2025.
How do Botswana and Equatorial Guinea rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added?
Botswana ranks 154th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 155th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Botswana vs Equatorial Guinea: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added. Statizoid, drawing on Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks. Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us/botswana/equatorial-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us/botswana/equatorial-guinea/">Botswana vs Equatorial Guinea: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)
Unit
constant 2015 US$
Source
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
240 places, 10,644 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing corresponds to ISIC (Rev. 4) divisions 01-03 and includes the exploitation of vegetal and animal natural resources, comprising the activities of growing of crops, raising and breeding of animals, harvesting of timber and other plants, animals or animal products from a farm or their natural habitats.Value added is the contribution to the economy by a producer or an industry or an institutional sector, which is estimated by the total value of output produced and deducting the total value of intermediate consumption of goods and services used to produce that output. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment is 2015. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.