Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Congo: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added

Bosnia and Herzegovina
1.05 billion constant 2015 US$
in 2025
Congo
978.16 million constant 2015 US$
in 2025
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
130th
Congo rank
132nd

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added over time

  • Bosnia and Herzegovina
  • Congo
200.0M400.0M600.0M800.0M1.0B1.2B196019922025

How they compare

Bosnia and Herzegovina currently reports 1.05 billion constant 2015 US$ against 978.16 million constant 2015 US$ in Congo, a difference of 68.17 million constant 2015 US$.

That makes Bosnia and Herzegovina's figure about 1.1 times Congo's.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Bosnia and Herzegovina has been ahead every year.

Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 130th and Congo ranks 132nd of 194 countries.

Bosnia and Herzegovina has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bosnia and Herzegovina Congo Difference Ahead
2000s 952.47 million constant 2015 US$ 484.95 million constant 2015 US$ 467.52 million constant 2015 US$ Bosnia and Herzegovina
2010s 1.01 billion constant 2015 US$ 719.76 million constant 2015 US$ 293.35 million constant 2015 US$ Bosnia and Herzegovina
2020s 1.05 billion constant 2015 US$ 900.19 million constant 2015 US$ 149.48 million constant 2015 US$ Bosnia and Herzegovina

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Congo?
Bosnia and Herzegovina, at 1.05 billion constant 2015 US$ against 978.16 million constant 2015 US$ in Congo as of 2025.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Congo?
68.17 million constant 2015 US$, with Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Congo?
26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Congo rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added?
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 130th and Congo ranks 132nd of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Congo: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added. Statizoid, drawing on Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks. Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us/bosnia-and-herzegovina/congo-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us/bosnia-and-herzegovina/congo-rep/">Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Congo: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)
Unit
constant 2015 US$
Source
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
240 places, 10,644 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing corresponds to ISIC (Rev. 4) divisions 01-03 and includes the exploitation of vegetal and animal natural resources, comprising the activities of growing of crops, raising and breeding of animals, harvesting of timber and other plants, animals or animal products from a farm or their natural habitats.Value added is the contribution to the economy by a producer or an industry or an institutional sector, which is estimated by the total value of output produced and deducting the total value of intermediate consumption of goods and services used to produce that output. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment is 2015. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.