Belize vs Eswatini: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added

Belize
253.21 million constant 2015 US$
in 2025
Eswatini
251.15 million constant 2015 US$
in 2025
Belize rank
158th
Eswatini rank
159th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added over time

  • Belize
  • Eswatini
0100.0M200.0M300.0M197019972025

How they compare

Belize currently reports 253.21 million constant 2015 US$ against 251.15 million constant 2015 US$ in Eswatini, a difference of 2.06 million constant 2015 US$.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 55 shared years of data; in 1971 it was Eswatini ahead.

Belize ranks 158th and Eswatini ranks 159th of 194 countries.

Eswatini has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belize Eswatini Difference Ahead
1970s 45.66 million constant 2015 US$ 179.61 million constant 2015 US$ 133.95 million constant 2015 US$ Eswatini
1980s 61.42 million constant 2015 US$ 180.41 million constant 2015 US$ 118.99 million constant 2015 US$ Eswatini
1990s 102.87 million constant 2015 US$ 194.68 million constant 2015 US$ 91.81 million constant 2015 US$ Eswatini
2000s 185.44 million constant 2015 US$ 238.20 million constant 2015 US$ 52.77 million constant 2015 US$ Eswatini
2010s 206.87 million constant 2015 US$ 282.45 million constant 2015 US$ 75.58 million constant 2015 US$ Eswatini
2020s 231.33 million constant 2015 US$ 266.82 million constant 2015 US$ 35.50 million constant 2015 US$ Eswatini

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added, Belize or Eswatini?
Belize, at 253.21 million constant 2015 US$ against 251.15 million constant 2015 US$ in Eswatini as of 2025.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added between Belize and Eswatini?
2.06 million constant 2015 US$, with Belize ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belize and Eswatini?
55 years are reported by both, from 1971 to 2025.
How do Belize and Eswatini rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added?
Belize ranks 158th and Eswatini ranks 159th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belize vs Eswatini: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added. Statizoid, drawing on Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks. Retrieved 04 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us/belize/eswatini/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us/belize/eswatini/">Belize vs Eswatini: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)
Unit
constant 2015 US$
Source
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
240 places, 10,644 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing corresponds to ISIC (Rev. 4) divisions 01-03 and includes the exploitation of vegetal and animal natural resources, comprising the activities of growing of crops, raising and breeding of animals, harvesting of timber and other plants, animals or animal products from a farm or their natural habitats.Value added is the contribution to the economy by a producer or an industry or an institutional sector, which is estimated by the total value of output produced and deducting the total value of intermediate consumption of goods and services used to produce that output. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment is 2015. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.