Bahamas vs Cape Verde: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added

Bahamas
83.30 million constant 2015 US$
in 2024
Cape Verde
94.52 million constant 2015 US$
in 2025
Bahamas rank
173rd
Cape Verde rank
171st

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added over time

  • Bahamas
  • Cape Verde
050.0M100.0M150.0M198020022025

How they compare

Cape Verde currently reports 94.52 million constant 2015 US$ against 83.30 million constant 2015 US$ in Bahamas, a difference of 11.23 million constant 2015 US$.

That makes Cape Verde's figure about 1.1 times Bahamas's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 36 shared years of data; in 1989 it was Bahamas ahead.

Bahamas ranks 173rd and Cape Verde ranks 171st of 194 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Bahamas averaged higher in 4 and Cape Verde in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bahamas Cape Verde Difference Ahead
1980s 126.75 million constant 2015 US$ 27.85 million constant 2015 US$ 98.90 million constant 2015 US$ Bahamas
1990s 141.03 million constant 2015 US$ 35.08 million constant 2015 US$ 105.95 million constant 2015 US$ Bahamas
2000s 140.75 million constant 2015 US$ 69.29 million constant 2015 US$ 71.46 million constant 2015 US$ Bahamas
2010s 101.99 million constant 2015 US$ 100.29 million constant 2015 US$ 1.71 million constant 2015 US$ Bahamas
2020s 66.39 million constant 2015 US$ 93.64 million constant 2015 US$ 27.25 million constant 2015 US$ Cape Verde

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added, Bahamas or Cape Verde?
Cape Verde, at 94.52 million constant 2015 US$ against 83.30 million constant 2015 US$ in Bahamas as of 2025.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added between Bahamas and Cape Verde?
11.23 million constant 2015 US$, with Cape Verde ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bahamas and Cape Verde?
36 years are reported by both, from 1989 to 2024.
How do Bahamas and Cape Verde rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added?
Bahamas ranks 173rd and Cape Verde ranks 171st of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bahamas vs Cape Verde: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added. Statizoid, drawing on Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks. Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us/bahamas-the/cabo-verde/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us/bahamas-the/cabo-verde/">Bahamas vs Cape Verde: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)
Unit
constant 2015 US$
Source
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
240 places, 10,644 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing corresponds to ISIC (Rev. 4) divisions 01-03 and includes the exploitation of vegetal and animal natural resources, comprising the activities of growing of crops, raising and breeding of animals, harvesting of timber and other plants, animals or animal products from a farm or their natural habitats.Value added is the contribution to the economy by a producer or an industry or an institutional sector, which is estimated by the total value of output produced and deducting the total value of intermediate consumption of goods and services used to produce that output. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment is 2015. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.