Azerbaijan vs Papua New Guinea: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added

Azerbaijan
4.56 billion constant 2015 US$
in 2025
Papua New Guinea
4.66 billion constant 2015 US$
in 2024
Azerbaijan rank
77th
Papua New Guinea rank
75th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added over time

  • Azerbaijan
  • Papua New Guinea
1.0B2.0B3.0B4.0B5.0B199220082025

How they compare

Papua New Guinea currently reports 4.66 billion constant 2015 US$ against 4.56 billion constant 2015 US$ in Azerbaijan, a difference of 105.92 million constant 2015 US$.

Across all 19 years both countries report, Papua New Guinea has been ahead every year.

Azerbaijan ranks 77th and Papua New Guinea ranks 75th of 194 countries.

Papua New Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Azerbaijan Papua New Guinea Difference Ahead
2000s 2.56 billion constant 2015 US$ 3.13 billion constant 2015 US$ 568.48 million constant 2015 US$ Papua New Guinea
2010s 3.25 billion constant 2015 US$ 3.81 billion constant 2015 US$ 563.34 million constant 2015 US$ Papua New Guinea
2020s 4.31 billion constant 2015 US$ 4.50 billion constant 2015 US$ 187.30 million constant 2015 US$ Papua New Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added, Azerbaijan or Papua New Guinea?
Papua New Guinea, at 4.66 billion constant 2015 US$ against 4.56 billion constant 2015 US$ in Azerbaijan as of 2024.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added between Azerbaijan and Papua New Guinea?
105.92 million constant 2015 US$, with Papua New Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Azerbaijan and Papua New Guinea?
19 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2024.
How do Azerbaijan and Papua New Guinea rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added?
Azerbaijan ranks 77th and Papua New Guinea ranks 75th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Azerbaijan vs Papua New Guinea: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added. Statizoid, drawing on Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks. Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us/azerbaijan/papua-new-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us/azerbaijan/papua-new-guinea/">Azerbaijan vs Papua New Guinea: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)
Unit
constant 2015 US$
Source
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
240 places, 10,644 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing corresponds to ISIC (Rev. 4) divisions 01-03 and includes the exploitation of vegetal and animal natural resources, comprising the activities of growing of crops, raising and breeding of animals, harvesting of timber and other plants, animals or animal products from a farm or their natural habitats.Value added is the contribution to the economy by a producer or an industry or an institutional sector, which is estimated by the total value of output produced and deducting the total value of intermediate consumption of goods and services used to produce that output. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment is 2015. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.