Australia vs Bangladesh: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added

Australia
39.96 billion constant 2015 US$
in 2025
Bangladesh
39.35 billion constant 2015 US$
in 2025
Australia rank
14th
Bangladesh rank
16th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added over time

  • Australia
  • Bangladesh
10.0B20.0B30.0B40.0B196019922025

How they compare

Australia currently reports 39.96 billion constant 2015 US$ against 39.35 billion constant 2015 US$ in Bangladesh, a difference of 609.10 million constant 2015 US$.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 51 shared years of data; in 1975 it was Australia ahead.

Australia ranks 14th and Bangladesh ranks 16th of 194 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 5 and Bangladesh in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Bangladesh Difference Ahead
1970s 14.08 billion constant 2015 US$ 9.13 billion constant 2015 US$ 4.95 billion constant 2015 US$ Australia
1980s 14.88 billion constant 2015 US$ 10.43 billion constant 2015 US$ 4.45 billion constant 2015 US$ Australia
1990s 19.09 billion constant 2015 US$ 13.17 billion constant 2015 US$ 5.92 billion constant 2015 US$ Australia
2000s 26.13 billion constant 2015 US$ 18.88 billion constant 2015 US$ 7.25 billion constant 2015 US$ Australia
2010s 31.17 billion constant 2015 US$ 28.39 billion constant 2015 US$ 2.78 billion constant 2015 US$ Australia
2020s 34.73 billion constant 2015 US$ 36.61 billion constant 2015 US$ 1.89 billion constant 2015 US$ Bangladesh

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added, Australia or Bangladesh?
Australia, at 39.96 billion constant 2015 US$ against 39.35 billion constant 2015 US$ in Bangladesh as of 2025.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added between Australia and Bangladesh?
609.10 million constant 2015 US$, with Australia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Bangladesh?
51 years are reported by both, from 1975 to 2025.
How do Australia and Bangladesh rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added?
Australia ranks 14th and Bangladesh ranks 16th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Bangladesh: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added. Statizoid, drawing on Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks. Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us/australia/bangladesh/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us/australia/bangladesh/">Australia vs Bangladesh: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)
Unit
constant 2015 US$
Source
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
240 places, 10,644 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing corresponds to ISIC (Rev. 4) divisions 01-03 and includes the exploitation of vegetal and animal natural resources, comprising the activities of growing of crops, raising and breeding of animals, harvesting of timber and other plants, animals or animal products from a farm or their natural habitats.Value added is the contribution to the economy by a producer or an industry or an institutional sector, which is estimated by the total value of output produced and deducting the total value of intermediate consumption of goods and services used to produce that output. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment is 2015. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.