Niger vs Poland: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 28 - International trade

Niger
141.74 Percentage of merchandise value
in 2020
Poland
40.41 Percentage of merchandise value
in 2020
Niger rank
45th
Poland rank
42nd

Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 28 - International trade over time

  • Niger
  • Poland
50100150200200020102020

How they compare

Niger currently reports 141.74 Percentage of merchandise value against 40.41 Percentage of merchandise value in Poland, a difference of 101.33 Percentage of merchandise value.

That makes Niger's figure about 3.5 times Poland's.

Across all 21 years both countries report, Niger has been ahead every year.

Niger ranks 45th and Poland ranks 42nd of 157 countries.

Niger has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Niger Poland Difference Ahead
2000s 159.33 Percentage of merchandise value 67.65 Percentage of merchandise value 91.68 Percentage of merchandise value Niger
2010s 126.83 Percentage of merchandise value 47.45 Percentage of merchandise value 79.39 Percentage of merchandise value Niger
2020s 141.74 Percentage of merchandise value 40.41 Percentage of merchandise value 101.33 Percentage of merchandise value Niger

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 28 - international trade, Niger or Poland?
Niger, at 141.74 Percentage of merchandise value against 40.41 Percentage of merchandise value in Poland as of 2020.
What is the difference in africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 28 - international trade between Niger and Poland?
101.33 Percentage of merchandise value, with Niger ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Niger and Poland?
21 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2020.
How do Niger and Poland rank globally for africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 28 - international trade?
Niger ranks 45th and Poland ranks 42nd of 157 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 28 - International trade costs — Average cost of trade within continent, manufactured goods. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Niger vs Poland: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 28 - International trade. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/africa-s-development-dynamics-afdd-table-28-international-trade-costs-average-cost-of-2/niger/poland-2/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/africa-s-development-dynamics-afdd-table-28-international-trade-costs-average-cost-of-2/niger/poland-2/">Niger vs Poland: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 28 - International trade</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 28 - International trade costs — Average cost of trade within continent, manufactured goods
Unit
Percentage of merchandise value
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
231 places, 4,559 data points, 2000–2020
Last refreshed

The Statistical Annex to the annual Africa's Development Dynamics (AFDD) report is a collection of development indicators that were gathered and analysed while conducting the research that went into the report. These data are also available online for free viewing or download at https://oe.cd/AFDD-2024, a bilingual website which links to the electronic version of the Africa's Development Dynamics book in both English and French. Table 28 shows the average cost of importing and exporting goods calculated as a percentage of the value of goods traded, broken down by the origin and destination of the trade, whether it is with bordering countries, with countries in the same region, or the same continent.