Jordan vs Myanmar: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 28 - International trade

Jordan
130.09 Percentage of merchandise value
in 2020
Myanmar
128.18 Percentage of merchandise value
in 2020
Jordan rank
56th
Myanmar rank
58th

Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 28 - International trade over time

  • Jordan
  • Myanmar
050100150200020102020

How they compare

Jordan currently reports 130.09 Percentage of merchandise value against 128.18 Percentage of merchandise value in Myanmar, a difference of 1.91 Percentage of merchandise value.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 14 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Myanmar ahead.

Jordan ranks 56th and Myanmar ranks 58th of 157 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Jordan averaged higher in 1 and Myanmar in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Jordan Myanmar Difference Ahead
2000s 113.33 Percentage of merchandise value 168.02 Percentage of merchandise value 54.69 Percentage of merchandise value Myanmar
2010s 124.96 Percentage of merchandise value 139.28 Percentage of merchandise value 14.32 Percentage of merchandise value Myanmar
2020s 130.09 Percentage of merchandise value 128.18 Percentage of merchandise value 1.91 Percentage of merchandise value Jordan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 28 - international trade, Jordan or Myanmar?
Jordan, at 130.09 Percentage of merchandise value against 128.18 Percentage of merchandise value in Myanmar as of 2020.
What is the difference in africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 28 - international trade between Jordan and Myanmar?
1.91 Percentage of merchandise value, with Jordan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Jordan and Myanmar?
14 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2020.
How do Jordan and Myanmar rank globally for africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 28 - international trade?
Jordan ranks 56th and Myanmar ranks 58th of 157 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 28 - International trade costs — Average cost of trade within continent, manufactured goods. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Jordan vs Myanmar: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 28 - International trade. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/africa-s-development-dynamics-afdd-table-28-international-trade-costs-average-cost-of-2/jordan/myanmar/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/africa-s-development-dynamics-afdd-table-28-international-trade-costs-average-cost-of-2/jordan/myanmar/">Jordan vs Myanmar: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 28 - International trade</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 28 - International trade costs — Average cost of trade within continent, manufactured goods
Unit
Percentage of merchandise value
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
231 places, 4,559 data points, 2000–2020
Last refreshed

The Statistical Annex to the annual Africa's Development Dynamics (AFDD) report is a collection of development indicators that were gathered and analysed while conducting the research that went into the report. These data are also available online for free viewing or download at https://oe.cd/AFDD-2024, a bilingual website which links to the electronic version of the Africa's Development Dynamics book in both English and French. Table 28 shows the average cost of importing and exporting goods calculated as a percentage of the value of goods traded, broken down by the origin and destination of the trade, whether it is with bordering countries, with countries in the same region, or the same continent.